ADSM-L

WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1

2015-10-04 18:08:48
Subject: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
Date: 4/22/97 3:05PM
Jerry Lawson
jlawson AT thehartford DOT com


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
Author:  INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
Date:    4/22/97 3:05 PM


     Is there something in the WINDOWS 95 client that makes it considerably
     slower than the WINDOWS 3.1 client ?

     When I run the ADSM backup client on WINDOWS 3.1, I get approximately
     1000K/sec transfer rate. On WINDOWS 95, I can barely sustain 510K. I
     am using the exact same DSM.OPT on both. Same network, same card,
     faster hardware.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>