Re[2]: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
1997-04-22 18:40:18
The WINDOWS 95 driver.
Of course, that would explain it.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
Author: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> at
Internet-Mail
Date: 4/22/97 5:24 PM
Are you using the same driver or a Windows 95 driver for the network
card ???
>----------
>From: Zoltan Forray[SMTP:zforray AT MAIL.UCC.VCU DOT EDU]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 1997 3:46 PM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
>
> Is there something in the WINDOWS 95 client that makes it considerably
> slower than the WINDOWS 3.1 client ?
>
> When I run the ADSM backup client on WINDOWS 3.1, I get approximately
> 1000K/sec transfer rate. On WINDOWS 95, I can barely sustain 510K. I
> am using the exact same DSM.OPT on both. Same network, same card,
> faster hardware.
>
|
|
|