ADSM-L

Re[2]: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1

1997-04-22 18:40:18
Subject: Re[2]: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
From: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT MAIL.UCC.VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:40:18 -0500
     The WINDOWS 95 driver.

     Of course, that would explain it.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
Author:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> at 
Internet-Mail
Date:    4/22/97 5:24 PM


Are you using the same driver or a Windows 95 driver for the network
card  ???

>----------
>From:  Zoltan Forray[SMTP:zforray AT MAIL.UCC.VCU DOT EDU]
>Sent:  Tuesday, April 22, 1997 3:46 PM
>To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject:       WINDOWS 95 client performance vs. WINDOWS 3.1
>
>     Is there something in the WINDOWS 95 client that makes it considerably
>     slower than the WINDOWS 3.1 client ?
>
>     When I run the ADSM backup client on WINDOWS 3.1, I get approximately
>     1000K/sec transfer rate. On WINDOWS 95, I can barely sustain 510K. I
>     am using the exact same DSM.OPT on both. Same network, same card,
>     faster hardware.
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>