ADSM-L

Re: Nextstgpool Question

1997-04-08 13:20:56
Subject: Re: Nextstgpool Question
From: David Ong <david AT BABYONG.NSC DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 10:20:56 -0700
Dwight,
Thanks for the response.

At 10:04 AM 4/8/97 -0500, you wrote:
>     Looks good to me...
>     you might also set the low=100
>     I tend to do unnecessary things such as that as an extra measure so if
>     someone else is dork'n with the system they will hopefully know it is
>     set that way for a reason...
>
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
>Subject: Nextstgpool Question
>Author:  ADSM-L (ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU) at unix,mime
>Date:    4/7/97 1:46 PM
>
>
>We have a 3494 ATL with mixed 3490 & 3590 cartridges. Consequently, we have
>defined 2 separate sequential tape pools, 3490pool & 3590pool.
>Occasionally, we would run out of scratch tapes in the 3490pool and backups
>would fail. What we have done to prevent this from happening is to update
>3490pool as follows:   nextstgpool=3590pool highmig=100
>in order to spill over to the 3590s only when there are no more 3490
>scratch tapes. However, we do not want migration to ever take place. Does
>anybody know it this will work?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Have a nice day or whatever's left of it.
>
>David Ong
>National Semiconductor Corp.
>

Have a nice day or whatever's left of it.

David Ong
National Semiconductor Corp.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>