ADSM-L

Re: More fun -

1997-03-02 14:57:02
Subject: Re: More fun -
From: jJane Walker <jawalke AT USWEST DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 12:57:02 -0700
Jerry,
  Have you tried issuing the MVS dump command for the ADSM address space?
I haven't ever tried this, but it may circumvent adding the DD to the
started task.
Jane
jawalke AT uswest DOT com


----------
> From: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
> From: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: More fun -
> Date: Friday, February 28, 1997 7:32 PM
>
> Date:   February 28, 1997                       Time:    9:19 PM
> From:   Jerry Lawson
>         The Hartford Insurance Group
>         (860) 547-2960    jlawson AT itthartford DOT com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> If you read my note from earlier today on Copy Pools, it mentioned a
> damaged tape, and our fun with the Copy pool tape reclamation.
> Unfortunately, sandwiched between those two events, we lost our MVS
server.
>  We have been running an MVS server for 3 years and had a grand total of
> one failure.  Now we have had 3 in 10 days.  They have all been similar.
> Unfortunately, ADSM has been running so well, we didn't realize that we
> didn't have a dump dd statement in the proc, and so we have no real
> documentation from failures.  Here is what I saw this morning.....
>
> We log on to the admin client (from either OS/2 or Win95, GUI or Command
> Line) and we can do things - check sessions, processes, stgpool  status,
> etc.  When we check sessions, we find backups that should have been done
> hours ago still active.  They show that they had done a good deal of
> activity, but don't seem to be doing anything.  Other sessions are coming
> and going (such as scheduled sessions checking in), but some sessions are
> obviously hung.  For example, if an admin checks a volume (Q vol) no
> response is returned, but the Q Session shows the status as "run".  If we
> cancel the session, it doesn't go away.  Sometimes the Win95 machines get
> hung, and we must reboot.
>
> When we check on processes, I find that there are many running.  I find
> that the expiration that kicks off nightly at 9:00 is still active.  It
> normally ends about 1:00.  Also, the DASD  pool appears to have filled
up,
> and a migration is underway.  (This is not our scheduled migration, which
> occurs at 3:00 in the afternoon).  There is also a backup of the same
> copypool running.
>
> My expectation is that the problem lies here.  The problem is that we
> cannot find the root of the problem and cancel it - canceled processes do
> not end.  We see mounted tapes, but nothing waiting for a mount, and no
> embraces.  Therefore I only can imply the failure is here from the
sessions
> that die on the Q Vol commands, and the fact that we are migrating and
> backing up the same pool at the same time.
>
> Anyone have any ideas?  As I said earlier, this is at level 2.1.0.7. We
> want to get to level 12, but that code is on a maintenance upgrade that's
> being held up due to a microcode problem somewhere.  TCP/IP is at level
> 3.1.
>
>
***************************************************************************
> **
> Jerry Lawson
> The Hartford Insurance Group
> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
> Any idiot can face a crisis.  It's the day to day stuff that really wears
> you down.
>
>                                                 Anton Chekov
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: More fun -, jJane Walker <=