%UTIL WRONG?
1997-02-14 13:39:23
I have noticed that on OS/2 clients with a drive > something (2 gb,
maybe) that capacity is recorded incorrectly when a Q FI nodename F=D
is issued. I have compensated for that in my reports. BUT, it always
appeared that %UTIL was accurate, even though capacity is wrong. Does
anyone know, is %UTIL inaccurate for large drives also on the OS/2
client?
Thanks,
Julie Phinney
JULPHINN @ EMPHESYS.E-MAIL.COM
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- %UTIL WRONG?,
Julie Phinney <=
|
|
|