ADSM-L

%UTIL WRONG?

1997-02-14 13:39:23
Subject: %UTIL WRONG?
From: Julie Phinney <julphinn AT EMPHESYS.E-MAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:39:23 EST
I have noticed that on OS/2 clients with a drive > something (2 gb,
maybe) that capacity is recorded incorrectly when a Q FI nodename F=D
is issued.  I have compensated for that in my reports.  BUT, it always
appeared that %UTIL was accurate, even though capacity is wrong.  Does
anyone know, is %UTIL inaccurate for large drives also on the OS/2
client?
Thanks,
Julie Phinney
JULPHINN @ EMPHESYS.E-MAIL.COM
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>