ADSM-L

Re: Return Codes

1996-12-12 07:41:26
Subject: Re: Return Codes
From: "Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 07:41:26 -0500
I also agree on the need for well documented return codes..... was
simply pointing out the -deletefiles switch as a possible solution to
the problem you described...

Tim Pittson

>----------
>From:  Heiko Andresen[SMTP:andresen AT DRESDNERBANK DOT DE]
>Sent:  Thursday, December 12, 1996 7:06 AM
>To:    Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject:       Re: Return Codes
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help.
>>
>> I grant you that the -deletefile switch woud provide a partial solution to
>>the
>> simple specific example that I was mentionning. One would still not know
>> whether the operation has been successful or not at the exit of dsmc,
>>though,
>> unless one starts to analyse logs or to check whether the archived files
>>have
>> been actually deleted.
>>
>> I (and apparently, many others) still would like to see dsmc to provide
>> sensible and documented return codes, hence providing another of the
>>features
>> of the better behaved unix commands.
>
>I am one of the many others, I strongly agree on that issue
>
>--
>   ***     Heiko Andresen            Internet: andresen AT dresdnerbank DOT de
>  ** **    Dresdner Bank AG             Voice: ++49 69 263 10276
> **   **   OR IT-SY B                     FAX: ++49 69 263 5062
>  *****    Windmuhlstr. 14
>           D-60301 Frankfurt am Main
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>