Re: Return Codes
1996-12-12 07:41:26
I also agree on the need for well documented return codes..... was
simply pointing out the -deletefiles switch as a possible solution to
the problem you described...
Tim Pittson
>----------
>From: Heiko Andresen[SMTP:andresen AT DRESDNERBANK DOT DE]
>Sent: Thursday, December 12, 1996 7:06 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject: Re: Return Codes
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help.
>>
>> I grant you that the -deletefile switch woud provide a partial solution to
>>the
>> simple specific example that I was mentionning. One would still not know
>> whether the operation has been successful or not at the exit of dsmc,
>>though,
>> unless one starts to analyse logs or to check whether the archived files
>>have
>> been actually deleted.
>>
>> I (and apparently, many others) still would like to see dsmc to provide
>> sensible and documented return codes, hence providing another of the
>>features
>> of the better behaved unix commands.
>
>I am one of the many others, I strongly agree on that issue
>
>--
> *** Heiko Andresen Internet: andresen AT dresdnerbank DOT de
> ** ** Dresdner Bank AG Voice: ++49 69 263 10276
> ** ** OR IT-SY B FAX: ++49 69 263 5062
> ***** Windmuhlstr. 14
> D-60301 Frankfurt am Main
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Return Codes, David Ong
- Re: Return Codes, Dwight Cook
- Re: Return Codes, Francis Dequenne
- Re: Return Codes, David Ong
- Re: Return Codes, Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US
- FW: Return Codes, Hilton Tina
- Re: Return Codes, Francis Dequenne
- Re: Return Codes, Heiko Andresen
- Re: Return Codes,
Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US <=
|
|
|