Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??
2015-10-04 18:11:36
Subject: |
Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page?? |
From: |
INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE |
To: |
Jerry Lawson at ASUPO |
Date: |
12/6/96 2:31PM |
You and your fellow developers have contributed very much to this list. I am
also very appreciative of the help you have provided me over the years, and I
would hope that it continues.
I think that the requirements list however, has the appearance of a Black Hole.
As I said in great detail earlier this year - there needs to be a better way of
submitting and tracking requirements than GUIDE and SHARE - especially for a
product that now runs on platforms such as NT, where the users probably never
heard of those user groups, and have no real reason to attend.
In short Dave - your efforts are well appreciated. I hope you all will continue
responding to e-mail posts are often time consuming, but the person receiving
them really appreciates them - I know I do!
Jerry Lawson
jlawson AT itthartford DOT com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, (continued)
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, William White
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Dave Cannon
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, David Ong
- Re[2]: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Eric LEWIS
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Mike Kaczmarski
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Richard Sims
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Jerry Lawson
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, ROHMER Glenn (MSMail)
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??, Peter Carranti
- Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??,
INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE <=
|
|
|