ADSM-L

Re: Autochangers - contn'd

1996-11-27 15:55:44
Subject: Re: Autochangers - contn'd
From: Chester Martel <cmartel AT PEACH.FRUIT DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 14:55:44 -0600
Zvi Bar-Deroma wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I asked a few questions concerning autochangers and received
> several replies (hope to see the ADSM developpers' answers concerning
> devices real soon now).
>
> One of the ppl. who answered me directly said (I am not mentioning his
> name as it was sent as private mail, not on the list):
>
> "only select a unit  from those having two (or more) drives.
> few functions - all of them tape2tape - in ADSM will work only if you
> have two drives (at least) in the library...."
>
> How important, are these "tape2tape" operations in ADSM ? How frequent are
> they used ? Any examples ? What if I don't have at least 2 drives - any
> way to overcome the problem ? (Please remember that we are, a rather small
> site - just our department, around 20-30 GB this year in less than 20 clients)
>
> /Zvika
>
> Zvika Bar-Deroma
> Systems and Network manager                       Phone: (+972)-4-829-2706
> Faculty of Aerospace Engineering,                 Fax  : (+972)-4-823-1848
> Technion                                          Home phone:
> Haifa 32000                                              (+972)-4-823-5562
> Israel
>
> Internet      :   zvika AT aeserv.technion.ac DOT il
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I set up an area I called movepool and move data from a tape that has
low utilization on it onto this pool then move data onto the current
tape.  My shop is about the same size and I have never missed not
being to do a tape to tape operation as far as ADSM is concerned.
My movepool size 1.5gb and it is adequate.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>