Re: bufpoolsize and logpoolsize values not honored?
1996-06-26 14:37:00
The specification for these parameters is in Kbytes. Since there are 4
Kbytes in a page, your bufferpool numbers jive. If you want to have 2048
pages, specify 8192 in the opt file. I can't explain the log pool numbers.
There was a bug about reporting of the log pool pages. It seems that the
pages get divided into read pages and write pages and only one of the
counts was being reported. I believe the bug is fixed in the lastest
server ptfs.
Bill Colwell
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Cambridge Ma.
_________________________Reply Header_________________________
Author: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Subject: bufpoolsize and logpoolsize values not honored?
06-26-96 01:40 PM
When I change the BUFPOOLSIZE and LOGPOOLSIZE parameters in DSMSERV OPT
on DSMSERV's 191/A-disk, I don't see the change reflected in command
outputs (Q DB F=D, Q LOG F=D).
For example, my current entries are
bufpoolsize 2048
logpoolsize 512
Yet the Query commands report
Buffer Pool Pages: 512"
and
Log Pool Pages: 6
Log Pool Pct. Util: 3.47
(at the moment).
Thanks in advance,
Wayne T. Smith internet: wts AT maine.maine DOT edu
Systems Group -- CAPS University of Maine System
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: bufpoolsize and logpoolsize values not honored?,
Bill Colwell <=
|
|
|