ADSM-L

Re: ADSM documentation

1996-04-29 15:13:17
Subject: Re: ADSM documentation
From: "Pittson, Timothy" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:13:17 -0400
I vote for PDF... easy to view and print and viewable via a web
browser...

Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com

>----------
>From:  Paul Zarnowski[SMTP:VKM AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
>Sent:  Monday, April 29, 1996 2:38 PM
>To:    Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject:       Re: ADSM documentation
>
>I like having postscript and PDF.  Also, you can view PDF files from
>most
>Web browsers now.  HTML is okay, but you lose all the graphics.
>--
>On Mon, 29 Apr 1996 13:28:50 -0500 Stacy Lacy said:
>>I second the request to have documentation available from any platform.  I
>>would
>>suggest that instead of the PostScript or PDF formats, why not provide
>>docs in
>>HTML format so it is directly accessible on the web, or can be
>>downloaded and
>>put on a customer web server.
>>
>>Web browsers are available for nearly all platforms.
>>
>>Stacy Lacy
>>Excel Corporation
>>stacy_lacy AT cargill DOT com
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>