Re: ADSM documentation
1996-04-29 15:13:17
I vote for PDF... easy to view and print and viewable via a web
browser...
Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com
>----------
>From: Paul Zarnowski[SMTP:VKM AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
>Sent: Monday, April 29, 1996 2:38 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject: Re: ADSM documentation
>
>I like having postscript and PDF. Also, you can view PDF files from
>most
>Web browsers now. HTML is okay, but you lose all the graphics.
>--
>On Mon, 29 Apr 1996 13:28:50 -0500 Stacy Lacy said:
>>I second the request to have documentation available from any platform. I
>>would
>>suggest that instead of the PostScript or PDF formats, why not provide
>>docs in
>>HTML format so it is directly accessible on the web, or can be
>>downloaded and
>>put on a customer web server.
>>
>>Web browsers are available for nearly all platforms.
>>
>>Stacy Lacy
>>Excel Corporation
>>stacy_lacy AT cargill DOT com
>
|
|
|