Re: ADSM v2 UNIX clients changing ctime
1995-11-15 11:15:12
Subject: |
Re: ADSM v2 UNIX clients changing ctime |
From: |
Michael R Vogt 301-975-2886 <vogt AT RAVEN.NIST DOT GOV> |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 1995 11:15:12 -0500 |
> Hi Baba,
>
> The change that was put in is a utime system call to restore the atime
> after a backup (and after a write during restore). This function call
> changes the ctime. I do not know of a way to update the atime without
> changing the ctime.
> I am interested in why you key on the ctime instead of either
> the access time or the modification time.
> John Viksne
John,
There are several reasons why one SHOULD use ctime instead of mtime to decide
on when to back up a file:
If you rename a file (mv):
you may have to recover it using it's original name.
If you change permissions or ownership of a file (chown/chgrp):
the recovered file will have the original permissions/ownership.
If you copy a file with mtime (cp -p):
you may have to recover it using it's original name.
If you extract a tar file without modifying the mtime (tar wo/-m):
you may have to reextract the tar file.
Personally, I would vote to see the atime change at backup time, rather
than the ctime.
Michael Vogt
vogt AT raven.nist DOT gov.
301-975-2886
|
|
|