ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: DLT or 3590....

2015-10-04 18:17:49
Subject: Re: DLT or 3590....
From: Hanna Hahne <Hanna.Hahne AT DKFZ-HEIDELBERG DOT DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> 
I have several question concerning ADSM/6000 support for ATL Odetics
libraries:
 Is the "ACL6/176"  supported?
Are DLT4000 drives supported?
If support is available - which ADSM Server Level (Version 1 and 2) is
needed?
If support is not available - when will it come out?

Hanna
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Windows scheduler V2.1, Lee Maschmeyer
Next by Date:  Why does ADSM use 536-byte data packets?, Andy Raibeck [SMTP:raibeck
Previous by Thread:  Re: DLT or 3590...., Jeffrey Mathers
Next by Thread:  [no subject], Pete Tanenhaus, ADSM Client Development
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]