Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*recovery\s+log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*recovery\s+log\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Recovery log (score: 1): Author: nghiatd <nghiatd2 AT FPT.COM DOT VN>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:30:14 +0700; hi all, In Administrattor's Guide, the recovery log contains information about database updates that have not yet been committed. So if I lose one of log file, I olny lose backup files in the last ba; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00836.html (8,244 bytes)
2. Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Mark Hayden <MHayden AT EPA.STATE.IL DOT US>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:05:55 -0600; HI all, We have had some issues with our recovery log filling up during archives. Our Db is growing at an a alarming speed , about 82 % of a 41 Gb db. Our log is only a gig in size..Is this to small?; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00702.html (8,447 bytes)
3. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Niklas Lundstrom <niklas.lundstrom AT FORENINGSSPARBANKEN DOT SE>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:52:27 +0100; Hello One gig is too small. I've had the same problem, when slow clients backed up alot of data it took several hours and the log began filling up. Regards Niklas HI all, We have had some issues with; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00716.html (8,946 bytes)
4. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: PAC Brion Arnaud <Arnaud.Brion AT PANALPINA DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:06:39 +0100; Hi Mark, You are probably suffering from so called "log pinning" symptom. To make it short : log is working on a circular basis, and can only be freed if all transactions that where written into it a; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00742.html (10,011 bytes)
5. Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:01:34 -0700; This morning I noticed my recovery log had risen to 83.2 at some point over the weekend. I'm already doing a full and one incremental backup of the log every day to keep it's size down. As you can se; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00876.html (9,238 bytes)
6. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: Rainer Wolf <rainer.wolf AT RZ.UNI-ULM DOT DE>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:26:43 +0200; Hello Gill, you may check the values how long a second version of a file stays in your default-backup-management class . If you count back the time your log-file was so high and you come to the date; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00880.html (9,696 bytes)
7. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: Jeff Bach <jdbach AT WAL-MART DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:36:11 -0500; If roll forward mode is not being used, the cause is probably a long transaction in the ADSM database. The exact transaction can be determined with show commands, but it is not easy at all. The easie; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00881.html (10,426 bytes)
8. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:34:21 -0500; and when that log seems to not clear (and you are in logmode normal) try a "ckpt" command from an admin session, that usually will cause it to clear (ckpt is another debug command to force a checkpoi; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00888.html (8,232 bytes)
9. Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:25:20 -0700; Hi all, After learning something about AIX I did some investigating on the system that IBM had set up for us. I discovered that the TSM database and log are on the same physical disk and mirrored thr; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg01175.html (9,687 bytes)
10. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: Jeff Bach <jdbach AT WAL-MART DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:20:41 -0500; Has anyone gotten these errors dueing a copy storage pool on 3.1.2.41 Server running on AIX with a 3494 SCSI attached LIbrary? What do they mean? How do I fix? Update Message: ANR0102E asalloc.c(4138; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg01180.html (10,466 bytes)
11. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: Joe Faracchio <brother AT SOCRATES.BERKELEY DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:32:59 -0700; Geoffrey, I think you're right and you're mistaken. Yes its important to seperate crictical volumes especially ones that compliment each other like DB and Log does. .... BUT It's more important to se; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg01229.html (9,057 bytes)
12. Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: "Doherty, John (ANFIS)" <jdohe1 AT ANFIS.CO DOT UK>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:26:04 +0100; Can anyone tell me how best to manage space in the recovery log and DB. Last night I received the following messages: 03/29/2000 05:28:38 ANR0314W Recovery log usage exceeds 90 % of its assigned capa; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01478.html (10,657 bytes)
13. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 06:51:13 -0600; You have your logmode set for rollforward and a DB backup should have initiated... Once the DB is backed up your log will return to a low value. Check your DB trigger I run mine in logmode normal and; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01479.html (12,012 bytes)
14. Re: Recovery Log (score: 1): Author: Eric Winters <ewinters AT AU1.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:51:21 +1000; John, We had similar problems a while back. I can report that filling the recovery log has unpredictable but invariable awful consequences such as the server going down or becoming inoperational. You; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01534.html (11,942 bytes)
15. Recovery log (score: 1): Author: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:43:41 +0100; Hi *SM-ers! I will soon migrate my ADSM 3.1.50 server on a H50 to TSM 3.7.2 on a H70 server. I'm trying to figure out the best disk layout on the H70. I will put the database on an AIX mirrored SSA d; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01152.html (9,738 bytes)
16. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:28:22 -0500; Eric, I believe IBM recommends using ADSM mirroring, not AIX mirroring, and I also seem to recall a previous discussion on this list some time ago regarding this. Having just gone through a database; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01169.html (11,409 bytes)
17. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:03:34 +0100; Hi Paul! I followed that discussion too a few months ago, however, I met a guy who is specialized in ADSM performance tuning and he indicated that AIX mirroring is reasonably faster than ADSM mirrori; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01256.html (9,319 bytes)
18. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:11:13 -0500; Eric, fire I believe IBM recommends using ADSM mirroring, not AIX mirroring, and I also seem to recall a previous discussion on this list some time ago regarding this. Having just gone through a data; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01257.html (11,464 bytes)
19. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Juris Vecvanags <Juris.Vecvanags AT VID.GOV DOT LV>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:25:32 +0200; chance is as big as loosing both mirrored disks , but I'll never seen crashing both miroored RAID disks :)) Yuris; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01258.html (8,992 bytes)
20. Re: Recovery log (score: 1): Author: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL]; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:11:13 -0500; Hi Paul! I followed that discussion too a few months ago, however, I met a guy who is specialized in ADSM performance tuning and he indicated that AIX mirroring is reasonably faster than ADSM mirrori; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01259.html (9,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]