Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+TSM\s+Client\s+Pricing\s+\-\s+a\s+BP\s+opinion\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:47:44 +0300
The thread is getting longer and longer and the frustration increases. So I will throw another attempt to explain things. 1. Formal disclaimer: I am working for an IBM Business Partner but not for IB
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00471.html (19,052 bytes)

2. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: "Coolen, IG (Ilja)" <ilja.coolen AT ABP DOT NL>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:03:17 +0200
Thumbs Up. <personal>This is what a good answer is all about</personal> Now i will get some sleep because the read was somewhat tiring ;-) Kind regards, Ilja G. Coolen _____ ABP / USZO CIS / BS / TB
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00472.html (20,765 bytes)

3. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Sal Mangiapane <salm AT VITALDS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 08:59:57 -0400
sal
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00482.html (21,654 bytes)

4. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Steve Roder <spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:38:22 -0400
Your "past" does not go very far back in terms of licensing for this product. I started out on this product when it was called WDSF (Workstation Data Save Facility), when it was only available on VM,
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00484.html (23,227 bytes)

5. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Steve Schaub <Steve.Schaub AT HAWORTH DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:35:14 -0400
I will agree that the new pricing model is less than ideal, and I would love to be able to buy an "unlimited" client license like we had under the 3466 program. But I am getting more than a little ti
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00516.html (24,381 bytes)

6. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 23:42:52 +0200
So now <collegue> sysadmin buys a box with 2 CPUs tells me it's a 2 CPU server and later upgrades his box, is he goiing to tell me? Not very likely. Not in a 80-person organisation like sara, evel le
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00587.html (14,054 bytes)

7. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:38:45 -0500
This is PRECISELY the point! The value of TSM is bringing economies of scale to the difficult but vital process of backing up individual workstations and servers. I fear we are in danger of losing th
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00621.html (9,800 bytes)

8. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: Hector Chan <hector.chan AT INCYEDGE DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:13:24 -0400
Try to automate archiving at the scheduled time. The schedule executed with a message "ANS1079E No file specification entered". What does this mean? I assumed archive shares the same include/exclude
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00622.html (10,090 bytes)

9. Re: new TSM Client Pricing - a BP opinion (score: 1)
Author: DFrance <DFrance-TSM AT ATT DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:16:46 -0700
Nice job, Zlatko... Thanks!@! Don France Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant Tivoli Storage Manager, WinNT/2K, AIX/Unix, OS/390 San Jose, Ca (408) 257-3037 mailto:don_france AT ayett D
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2003-05/msg00896.html (10,465 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu