Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Upgrading\s+to\s+3\.1\.2\.50\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Upgrading\s+to\s+3\.1\.2\.50\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Upgrading to 3.1.2.50 (score: 1): Author: "Mauro Jr, Frank" <Frank.MauroJr AT LIBERTYMUTUAL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:56:00 -0500; You are recommending NOT to upgrade to version 3.1.2.40 or 3.1.2.50 of the ADSM server? What is wrong with 3.1.2.50? I am at version 3.1.2.20 and things seem to be running fine. I do receive the foll; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg01399.html (10,381 bytes)
2. Re: Upgrading to 3.1.2.50 (score: 1): Author: Steven P Roder <tkssteve AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:30:46 -0500; I do not remember the specifics, but I do recall seeing problems with level 50 discussed here, which is why I am staying at 42. Steve Roder, University at Buffalo VM Systems Programmer UNIX Systems; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg01408.html (8,703 bytes)
3. Re: Upgrading to 3.1.2.50 (score: 1): Author: Herve Chibois <Herve.Chibois AT FR.ABNAMRO DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 07:42:06 +0100; Hi Frank 3.1.2.20 had serious expiration problem. Some guys have problems w/ the 3.1.2.50 version but it is the latest version recommended by IBM. If you have STK libs, pliz do upgrade ! Herve You ar; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg01450.html (10,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]