Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\,\s+extending\s+backup\s+storage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\,\s+extending\s+backup\s+storage\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: "Rooij, FC de" <Fred.deRooij AT CORUSGROUP DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:04:45 +0100; Question: I think about a huge diskpool without migration to tape. Is there a limitation on the size of the diskpools? If not, are there things I have not thought about? The backup-service is separat; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00615.html (9,571 bytes)
2. Re: TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: Angelo DeAngelis <storage4san AT WORLDNET.ATT DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:40:39 -0500; Not aware of any limitations regarding the size of disk pools. Currently I have seen customer that has a 4Tb disk pool defined on a EMC. Spread the volumes amoung controllers.; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00627.html (8,851 bytes)
3. TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: "Rooij, FC de" <Fred.deRooij AT CORUSGROUP DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:43:25 -0500; can; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00628.html (9,950 bytes)
4. Re: TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: Salak Juraj <j.salak AT ASAMER DOT AT>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:35:06 +0100; Hallo, not even as strange idea as you think. In fact, this configuration is recommended for backing-up directories since years, so this is only an uncommon idea expansion. I am just going to impleme; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00637.html (10,429 bytes)
5. TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: Rooij, FC de [mailto:Fred.deRooij AT CORUSGROUP DOT COM]; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:43:25 -0500; Question: I think about a huge diskpool without migration to tape. Is there a limitation on the size of the diskpools? If not, are there things I have not thought about? The backup-service is separat; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00638.html (9,523 bytes)
6. Re: TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: Bill Mansfield <WMansfield AT SOLUTIONTECHNOLOGY DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:56:04 -0600; As long as you provide for protection against disk failures in your primary pool, this is fine. You'll still need tape for copy pools, since they have to be sequential devices and you want offsite co; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00678.html (11,588 bytes)
7. Re: TSM, extending backup storage (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:45:46 +0200; This is good idea but I think there are other aspects to take into account: in case of RAID array failure you should have a copy pool to restore. You can make file copypool but you cannot send disks; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg01275.html (11,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]