Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slow\s+restore\s+of\s+entire\s+server\s+volume\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slow\s+restore\s+of\s+entire\s+server\s+volume\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Slow restore of entire server volume (score: 1): Author: Nancy Ames <nlames AT GUNDLUTH DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:25:07 -0500; We lost a server volume over the weekend - Netware 5.1 server - 20 GB or so to restore from tape. The process is going extremely slowly; it seems that most of the time is being spent retrieving tapes; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00491.html (8,542 bytes)
2. Re: Slow restore of entire server volume (score: 1): Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:56:56 -0500; Welcome to the world of non-collocation. If you're using a tape medium that is not very fast to mount and spin up (DLT, for example), and your client has non-collocated data, your TSM server is havin; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00493.html (10,042 bytes)
3. Re: Slow restore of entire server volume (score: 1): Author: "Miller, Ryan" <Miller.Ryan AT PRINCIPAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:06:47 -0500; Is your storage pool you are restoring from collocated? Do you have an automated tape library or manual tape drives?; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00495.html (8,451 bytes)
4. Re: Slow restore of entire server volume (score: 1): Author: Dirk Kastens <Dirk.Kastens AT UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE>; Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:57:54 +0200; Hi, Do you have a separate management class for directories (see the option DIRMC)? During a restore, TSM first recovers the directory structure and then the files. If you don't have a directory mang; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00509.html (9,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]