- 1. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Etienne Brodeur <ebrodeur AT SERTI DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:54:17 -0400
- I am suddenly having the same problem... Reclamation is very slow. I barely manage to reclaim 1 GB/hour, which wasn't the case in the beginning (I think after all in the beginning I didn't have so mu
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg00997.html (13,570 bytes)
- 2. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:55:48 -0400
- When the primary location of a file is in a primary DISK random access storage pool, then this is "working as designed." (That's the answer we got from Tivoli) In this case the reclamation task proce
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01010.html (9,148 bytes)
- 3. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:59:42 -0400
- This was from an old email of mine. We got info that my last paragraph was a good guess, it is a TSM design problem. Notice carefully if when the Reclamation is running slow, that there is just an ou
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01011.html (16,523 bytes)
- 4. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Rejean Larivee/Quebec/IBM <rlarivee AT CA.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:15:27 -0300
- Hello, yes, this is working as designed and explained in apar IC15925. One way to easily circumvent this is to use a FILE stgpool instead of a DISK stgpool. That should work just fine. Regards, -- Re
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01026.html (10,125 bytes)
- 5. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Etienne Brodeur <ebrodeur AT SERTI DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:03:17 -0400
- I did try it and it does move a lot faster.. So this has nothing to do with the fact that my diskpool is on a SAN drives right? So keeping data on diskpool is not a good idea in small installations?
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01036.html (9,806 bytes)
- 6. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:14:13 -0400
- It has more to do with LTO tapes becuase they don't handle the "little files spoon fed one at a time" as well as say 3570 tapes. I have both here and can compare. The root cause is TSM design though.
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01040.html (10,540 bytes)
- 7. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:10:34 -0400
- We initially got bit on this with the DIRMC storage pool, but I installed TSM at a site where their concern was restore speed and we elected to turn on CACHE for the disk storage pool. Turns out that
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-06/msg01072.html (9,566 bytes)
- 8. Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:23:58 -0500
- I have old TSM server 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3 with 3575-L32 library with C-XL drives. New server is TSM 4.2.1.9 on AIX 4.3.3 ML09 and IBM 3584-L32 library with 8 FC-AL drives. Having the 3584 running fo
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00876.html (12,057 bytes)
- 9. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Daniel Sparrman <daniel.sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:25:50 +0100
- Hi How is your diskpool configured? Is it placed locally on the machine, or is it SAN attached? Best Regards Daniel Sparrman -- Daniel Sparrman Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Bergkällavägen 31D
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00877.html (14,671 bytes)
- 10. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushfor AT CITY.WINNIPEG.MB DOT CA>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:33:16 -0600
- Yep, it is a design flaw! Apar IC15925 describes this issue. -- ERROR DESCRIPTION ERROR DESCRIPTION During an offsite reclamation process; where files are being transfered from disk to tape. ADSM fai
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00878.html (10,356 bytes)
- 11. Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: David Longo [mailto:David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG]
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:39:20 -0500
- I have old TSM server 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3 with 3575-L32 library with C-XL drives. New server is TSM 4.2.1.9 on AIX 4.3.3 ML09 and IBM 3584-L32 library with 8 FC-AL drives. Having the 3584 running fo
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00879.html (12,122 bytes)
- 12. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:51:05 -0500
- That's it, alright! That APAR was from ADSM 2.1 closed in July 1997!! I guess the fix is on the "back burner". David Longo Yep, it is a design flaw! Apar IC15925 describes this issue. -- ERROR DESCRI
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00881.html (10,537 bytes)
- 13. Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:39:20 -0500
- I have old TSM server 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3 with 3575-L32 library with C-XL drives. New server is TSM 4.2.1.9 on AIX 4.3.3 ML09 and IBM 3584-L32 library with 8 FC-AL drives. Having the 3584 running fo
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00882.html (13,490 bytes)
- 14. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:57:51 -0500
- We went round-and-round with Tivoli on this issue. They say it's working as designed. Here's what's happening... When the location of a file is on DISK which is RANDOM access, then TSM processes the
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00884.html (9,761 bytes)
- 15. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:39:20 -0500
- Hi How is your diskpool configured? Is it placed locally on the machine, or = is it SAN attached? Best Regards Daniel Sparrman -- Daniel Sparrman Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Bergk=E4llav=E4g
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00885.html (13,254 bytes)
- 16. Re: Slow Reclamation from disk (score: 1)
- Author: Henk ten Have <hthta AT SARA DOT NL>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:36:10 +0100
- I know it's not Friday, but this is even funnier then all the "I'm not here" in about 8 languages....;-) Cheers, Henk.
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/2002-03/msg00897.html (9,083 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu