Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Recommended\s+ADSM\s+hardware\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: arhoads <arhoads AT PACBELL DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 21:53:26 -0700
1. Go for an *80, whatever you can afford. Disk (SSA) is more important than RAM. Couldn't justify much more than 256MB on ADSM -- havn't any evidence for TSM. AIX will use the extra so go for a gig
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00415.html (9,549 bytes)

2. Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: "Marc D. Taylor" <mdtaylor AT UIUC DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 08:43:31 -0500
Hello All, I am tasked with the responsibility of developing a proposal for a new ADSM server. Presently, we have an IBM J40 w/ 256 MB ram, 25 GB of disk storage. We are using dlt2000 drives. What I
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01182.html (9,555 bytes)

3. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:05:09 -0400
Hi, It all depends on database size, backup time requiremnt, , no of clients , how much data they TSM will backup every night can you give input on this? Shekhar
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01185.html (8,985 bytes)

4. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Pat Wilson <paw AT NORTHSTAR.DARTMOUTH DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1975 05:30:38 -0500
Marc - I'm certainly interested in what you wind up with. At lot of your answers are going to depend on how much data you're backing up for how many clients in what time window, and what your restore
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01196.html (10,323 bytes)

5. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Don Ricetti <ricettid AT AQUATECH DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:05:23 -0400
Currently I am utilizing a AIT tape library system from Cybernetics. The small stacker holds 15 AIT/AIT 2 tapes. This is a dual drive unit (Sony SDX-300)which allows both drives to work together or i
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01198.html (10,362 bytes)

6. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Robert Molerio <rjm AT PANIX DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:33:04 -0400
Hi ADSMer's I need to get off my DLT IV library soon. Can anybody recommend a IBM or 3rd party vendor that will work with ADSM 3.2.40 and eventually TSM3.7.1? I think I will need a library that holds
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01201.html (9,071 bytes)

7. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: "Wallace, Gary C" <gary.c.wallace AT INTEL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:42:35 -0700
We migrated from DLT 3000 tape units to IBM 3494 Tape libraries, they are a lot more stable than any DLT drives we used. Gary Wallace Storage Engineer Intel Online Services Technology Integration Man
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01203.html (9,084 bytes)

8. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Robert Molerio [mailto:rjm AT panix DOT com]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:05:12 -0500
Hi ADSMer's I need to get off my DLT IV library soon. Can anybody recommend a IBM or 3rd party vendor that will work with ADSM 3.2.40 and eventually TSM3.7.1? I think I will need a library that holds
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01204.html (9,093 bytes)

9. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Palmadesso Jack <Jack.Palmadesso AT SWPC.SIEMENS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:01:03 -0400
If you need to reuse your DLTs then Breece Hill makes a good little library. I am using 2 Q47s with 3 DLT4000 drives and am deploying 4 more q 47s with DLT8000 drives. Each holds 60 tapes in a rotati
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01207.html (9,370 bytes)

10. Re: Recommended ADSM hardware (score: 1)
Author: Wallace, Gary C
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:05:12 -0500
We migrated from DLT 3000 tape units to IBM 3494 Tape libraries, they are a lot more stable than any DLT drives we used. Gary Wallace Storage Engineer Intel Online Services Technology Integration Man
/lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01208.html (9,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu