Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RE\s+Unravel\s+amstatus\s+output\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RE\s+Unravel\s+amstatus\s+output\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: Cyrille Bollu <Cyrille.Bollu AT fedasil DOT be>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:12:52 +0200; Looking with my newbie's eyes it seems that Amanda is running well. Just very slowly. And Amanda's log seems to indicate that the problem is on the tape drive side. The only thing strange that I see; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00255.html (16,917 bytes)
2. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:36:21 -0700 (PDT); Good point - and that is why I need help unravelling what it all means. My question now would be: 0.41% of what? What would 100% of that something represent? Constant streaming of data to tape from h; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00256.html (16,330 bytes)
3. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: Cyrille Bollu <Cyrille.Bollu AT fedasil DOT be>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:47:41 +0200; owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org a écrit sur 17/07/2006 11:36:21 : My of that something AFAIK, 100% would mean constant streaming. The some Yep, it looks like... well. Just tape drive say that I; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00257.html (19,233 bytes)
4. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:14:14 +0200; of the total elapsed time since the program started. But there is some caveat. The amstatus command works by parsing the log file. And the logfile is written to only when there is a change in state i; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00258.html (18,964 bytes)
5. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:16:27 -0700 (PDT); Well, one thing I've noticed is that the DLEs in question are the ones with largest overall size: +/- 8GB +/- 9GB +/- 32GB All the other DLEs (except for the two I mentioned, which are in fact hidden; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00259.html (18,942 bytes)
6. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:32:07 -0700 (PDT); When I execute the top command (Red Hat Enterprise 3) for user Amanda, I get: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 2136 amanda 15 0 948 948 836 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 amdump 2145; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00260.html (21,258 bytes)
7. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:44:32 +0200; UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD amanda 2136 2135 0 Jul14 ? 00:00:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/amdump daily amanda 2145 2136 0 Jul14 ? 00:00:02 /usr/lib/amanda/driver daily amanda 2146 2145 0 Jul14 ? 00:00:; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00261.html (12,409 bytes)
8. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:16:22 -0700 (PDT); Red Hat Enterprise 3 doesn't seem to have strace as a command. I thought rather than killing the processes manually, I'd reboot the server and see if amcleanup runs as included in /etc/rc.d/rc.local; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00262.html (16,764 bytes)
9. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:59:04 -0700 (PDT); Ok, so I ran amflush again. It flushed 2 of the 3 outstanding DLE's data to daily-1, but the email I received includes: The dumps were flushed to tape daily-1. The next tape Amanda expects to use is:; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00264.html (18,796 bytes)
10. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: Alexander Jolk <alexj AT buf DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:27:59 +0200; And the holding disk still contains a folder with Friday's date and a 30GB file for the DLE mentioned above. Can you try cat'ting the file to /dev/null? My first guess would be that some blocks of th; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00266.html (10,822 bytes)
11. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:46:57 -0700 (PDT); Sorry, I've already went and deleted that file... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unravel-amstatus-output-tf1953587.html#a5361151 Sent from the Amanda - Users forum at Nabble.c; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00267.html (11,191 bytes)
12. Re: RE Unravel amstatus output (score: 1): Author: "Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists AT nabble DOT com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:30:31 -0700 (PDT); Well, for what it's worth: I ran a backup job with just the DLEs that failed to backup/flush, and it all went well. I then ran the exact same job I did on Friday, and it succeeded with no errors this; /lists/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00288.html (10,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]