Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DIRMC\s+Option\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DIRMC\s+Option\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. DIRMC option (score: 1): Author: John O'Neall <jon AT IN2P3 DOT FR>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 12:45:07 +0200; I think I have a problem with the DIRMC option. My first problem is that I didn't read ALL the doc (between 1500 and 2000 pages) and so (as an immigrant from WDSF) I didn't know about it. :-\ "If you; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-06/msg00215.html (8,951 bytes)
2. Re: DIRMC option (score: 1): Author: Dirk Kastens <dkastens AT RZ.UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 13:10:41 +0200; John, did you (re)activate the policy set after defining the management classes? Otherwise the changes won't take effect. Greetings, Dirk Kastens _______________Dirk.Kastens AT rz.Uni-Osnabrueck DOT; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-06/msg00216.html (9,029 bytes)
3. Re: DIRMC option (score: 1): Author: John O'Neall <jon AT IN2P3 DOT FR>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 13:14:11 +0200; Yes, and in any case, the default class has always been the default class. I've now put the DIRMC option into dsm.sys on the client and restarted the client and it's busy rebinding all the directorie; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-06/msg00217.html (9,537 bytes)
4. DIRMC Option (score: 1): Author: Mike Bachert <uscgs8ts AT IBMMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 10:15:57 EDT; I have a storage area set up for directories and have used DIRMC to store directories. My local ADSM contact thinks DIRMC might not be needed or useful anymore. Is the DIRMC option worthwhile? Commen; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1995-06/msg00044.html (7,943 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]