Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Acceptance\s+$Was\s+support\s+ADSM$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Acceptance\s+$Was\s+support\s+ADSM$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Mike Stewart <STEWAJM AT AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 10:21:00 -0500; ** Original Author: ADSM-L @ MARIST - ** Remote User **; 04/16/96 04:45pm All, I've read with interest the discussion on knowledge needed to support ADSM. I'm an MVS tech support person so when I app; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00247.html (10,442 bytes)
2. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Ole Holm Nielsen <ohnielse AT FYSIK.DTU DOT DK>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 11:05:59 -0500; My 2 cents' worth to this discussion of ADSM acceptance: (lines deleted) I manage a UNIX network, mainly RS/6000 (SP2s, workstations), plus Suns and HP's. As a UNIX manager, I need to do backups, and; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00249.html (12,408 bytes)
3. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Dirk Kastens <dkastens AT RZ.UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 12:40:05 +0200; I can only second that. I'm just teaching myself how to set up an ADSM server and I have to cross-read all the manuals at once. I first installed the hardware devices (tape drive and library) and obv; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00273.html (10,005 bytes)
4. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: "Andreas.Floeter" <Andreas.Floeter AT AIRBUS DOT DE>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:38:15 +0200; I only can second this too. We are looking at ADSM with several people trying to get it operational, both MVS and Unix experts and it gives us a very hard time. The information you need for a stable; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00321.html (11,471 bytes)
5. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Mathers <matherj AT ROCKVAX.ROCKEFELLER DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:03:30 +0000; For what it's worth you can add my name to this litany about the pathetic documentation. In a way its nice to hear that all platforms are treated equally badly. I though this was just IBM dropping th; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00330.html (9,143 bytes)
6. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Joe Morris <morris AT UNC DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:15:13 -0400; All the books are good for is reference. They're useless for showing conecpts and sturcture. We need some basic inllustrations on how things are setup instead of digging through documentation at leas; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00334.html (9,848 bytes)
7. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: "Stokes, Van Jr." <vstokes AT SMMI DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:45:59 -0500; Yea, me too. IBM's manuals have always been - pathetic. You may say they are similar to Microsofts Manuals: Full of facts but say absolutely nothing. I have been complaining for years about their man; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00335.html (10,558 bytes)
8. Re: Acceptance (Was support ADSM) (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Mathers <matherj AT ROCKVAX.ROCKEFELLER DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:22:52 +0000; Joe, Some of the redbooks are pretty good for installation. For example the "Getting Started with ADSM/2" is essential for those new to ADSM. Unfortunately it has errors in it and it does not come wi; /lists/html/ADSM-L/1996-04/msg00337.html (9,342 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]