- 1. ADSM for MVS and CA-1 (score: 1)
- Author: Julie Phinney <jphinney AT HUMANA DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 16:07:13 -0500
- I'm running ADSM 3.1.2.14 on MVS. I've noticed we have a bunch of tapes out there now with the ADSM dataset name on them (hlq.BFS) with a zero block count, and I was asked to get rid of them. I did a
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/1999-06/msg00128.html (8,654 bytes)
- 2. Re: ADSM for MVS and CA-1 (score: 1)
- Author: Andreas Buser <Andreas.Buser AT BASLER DOT CH>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:55:44 +0200
- Hi Julie, you have to implement the TAPEDELETION-Exit. In the ANRSREV.OPTIONS File insert the follwing line: DELETIONEXIT xxxxxx (Where xxx is the name of the TAPEVOL-EXIT) In fact it is the same exi
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/1999-06/msg00135.html (9,566 bytes)
- 3. Re: ADSM for MVS and CA-1 (score: 1)
- Author: Julie Phinney <jphinney AT HUMANA DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 21:39:26 -0500
- Hi, I have specified the tape deletion exit, and ADSM has worked fine with CA-1 for years at our site... until now. Has anyone seen a bug with that tape deletion exit where in some cases it doesn't w
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/1999-06/msg00177.html (10,197 bytes)
- 4. Re: ADSM for MVS and CA-1 (score: 1)
- Author: "Toora, Kuli" <kulbinder.toora AT MEB.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:13:02 +0100
- When you backed out the v 3.1.2.20 did you also back out the database to a previous backup?, this might explain why you have volumes assigned to ADSM by your tape management system that ADSM does not
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/1999-06/msg00181.html (12,726 bytes)
- 5. Re: ADSM for MVS and CA-1 (score: 1)
- Author: Francis Maes <fr.maes AT CGER DOT BE>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:30:59 +0200
- Hello, We have just upgraded our ADSM test server from L14 to L20 on OS/390 2.6. I have just tested the deletion of a cartridge volume. It seems to work fine with CA/1. TMC EXPDT is upgraded from PER
- /lists/html/ADSM-L/1999-06/msg00187.html (11,410 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu