Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+Upgrade\s+to\s+TSM\s+3\.7\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+Upgrade\s+to\s+TSM\s+3\.7\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: Lisa Faulconer <Lisa.Faulconer AT WACHOVIA DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 15:42:47 -0500; We are about to upgrage from ADSM 3.1.2.20 to TSM 3.7.1.0. Any "gotchas" we should look for? Our STK 9710 silo is managed by ACSLS 5.3.; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01533.html (8,691 bytes)
2. Re: ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: Len Boyle <SNOLEN AT VM.SAS DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:09:14 EST; If you are using dlt7000's the readme for the ptf for TSm 3.7 calls for the microcode to be upgraded to V95. The good news is that with the v95 microcode and the the TSM 3.7.1 code level or ADSM 3.1; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01542.html (9,112 bytes)
3. Re: ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:09:07 -0500; Wea re AIX 4.3.2. I went from ADSM 3.1.2.42 to TSM 3.7.2.0. We also have STK 9710's run by ACSLS 5.3.2. Have hit no problems so far, except that the /etc/inittab entries were not updated correctly by; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01591.html (9,387 bytes)
4. Re: ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: Kyle Payne <payne AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 09:10:15 -0600; In the readme it says that you need to have the latest version of the Quantum drive code. I believe that is V95. I am assuming you are using DLT drives in the 9730. Kyle; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01593.html (8,817 bytes)
5. ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:11:14 -0500; We are about to upgrage from ADSM 3.1.2.20 to TSM 3.7.1.0. Any "gotchas" we should look for? Our STK 9710 silo is managed by ACSLS 5.3.; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01594.html (8,811 bytes)
6. Re: ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: "Burton, Robert" <ROBERT.BURTON AT ROYALBANK DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:48:24 -0500; The only problem we experienced was the fact that Tivoli/IBM now classifies TSM as new code and makes it un-upgradable over existing ADSM code. We found with the size of our installation, the upgrade; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01606.html (9,282 bytes)
7. ADSM Upgrade to TSM 3.7 (score: 1): Author: Lisa Faulconer [mailto:Lisa.Faulconer AT WACHOVIA DOT COM]; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:11:14 -0500; We are about to upgrage from ADSM 3.1.2.20 to TSM 3.7.1.0. Any "gotchas" we should look for? Our STK 9710 silo is managed by ACSLS 5.3.; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01607.html (8,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]