Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Tape\s+encryption\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Tape\s+encryption\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Cruice, Daniel $US - Glen Mills$" <dcruice AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:32:44 -0400; Looking for some information regarding tape encryption, anyone out there using it? And if so what kind of tape degradation did you experience. We are being asked to implement it and we are just tryin; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00051.html (11,776 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Austin Murphy" <austin.murphy AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:59:14 -0400; I don't know what you mean by tape degradation, but software encryption does have a significant effect. If you use the NetBackup encryption option, your tape drives will not compress the encrypted da; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00052.html (12,192 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Cruice, Daniel $US - Glen Mills$" <dcruice AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:02:42 -0400; I was just looking for like a percentage 10%, 20%, degradation...and if meaning tape drive will not compress the encrypted data, if I am using LTO3, the best I'll get on tape is about 400GB at best.; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00053.html (13,396 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:17:07 -0500; Unless all of your clients are really, really tiny, you’re not going to want to look at software encryption so you really have 2 options – Decru and Neoscale appliances. We’ve been; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00055.html (17,993 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Len Boyle" <Len.Boyle AT sas DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:22:27 -0400; Hello Dan, We have been working with netbackup client encryption and decru encryption. We use the netbackup encryption option without compression. So the tape drives (lto-2 and lto-3 could not compre; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00056.html (16,082 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:44:23 -0400; Curious – you say you backup the keys – do you store those backups offsite and if so is that in a different location than the regular backups? It seems it would be important to not keep t; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00072.html (20,634 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Curtis Preston" <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:52:17 -0400; The keys in a Decru box are not usable unless you authenticate the new system. This is done via a key quorum, where you say that n of y security officers (identified by a secure card, username, & pas; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00095.html (24,089 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:18:07 -0500; We keep the keys, the tapes, and the recovery cards all in different places. Additionally, we have one of the FC520 appliances in a DR site that’s a member of the cluster so it always has activ; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00098.html (21,715 bytes)
9. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Weber, Philip" <Philip.Weber AT egg DOT com>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:15:21 +0100; Anybody any experience of Spectralogic's library-based encryption? We are about to start out no implementing this - basically the encryption, and optionally compression, is carried out in the fibre c; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00102.html (16,132 bytes)
10. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Brad Hillebrand" <brad.hillebrand AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:03:48 -0400; Does anyone have any experience with the NeoScale Cryptostore FC appliances? Or did anyone compare the decru vs. NeoScale solutions? _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillis; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00105.html (10,078 bytes)
11. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Hudson, Steve" <Steve.Hudson AT ironmountain DOT com>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:37:34 -0400; Yes we did a bake off between Decru and Neoscale and Decru won handily. More mature and more support for the Unix O/S. ( Neoscale did not support HP/UX at the time). From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailm; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00106.html (12,990 bytes)
12. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: Jon Bousselot <jon_bousselot AT sd.vrtx DOT com>; Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:27:31 -0700; I recently evaluated the Veritas MSEO product, and was very impressed. The version I received only ran on Solaris/Sparc and Windows. I tested the Solaris version. It creates a software based encrypti; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00109.html (13,296 bytes)
13. [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Johnson, Wesley" <Wesley.Johnson AT corp.aol DOT com>; Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:03:41 -0400; Key management for NetBackup encryption has historically been rough; also, you will loose drive level compression. New encryption appliances will allow for compression and simplified key management.; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00406.html (9,107 bytes)
14. Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:37:34 -0500; The Decru encryption appliances definitely compress and I’d be really surprised if the NeoScale ones didn’t. And you don’t actually lose drive level compression – it remains e; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00409.html (12,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]