Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+on\s+CentOS\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+on\s+CentOS\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ?? (score: 1): Author: Robin Small <Robin.Small AT fresno DOT gov>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:21:43 -0800; I’m wondering if any of you know why CentOS isn’t supported as a NBU Master? I’ve tried googledredging, but all I’ve really managed to find is that it’s technically poss; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2010-03/msg00049.html (9,976 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ?? (score: 1): Author: Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:36:36 -0600; Im wondering if any of you know why CentOS isnt supported as a NBU Master? The compatibility matrix isn't really about what works - it's about what Symantec will support. Many people have done all; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2010-03/msg00051.html (10,961 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ?? (score: 1): Author: Robin Small <Robin.Small AT fresno DOT gov>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:31:56 -0800; Fair enough.. Or at least along the lines of what I was suspecting was the case (the supportability of it). I’m running mine on SLES (was v9 with v6.x, upgrading as we speak to v11 to go with N; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2010-03/msg00052.html (13,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]