Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NOM\s+6\.5\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NOM\s+6\.5\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: spaldam <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:39:00 -0500; I started to see problems with the Master server not allowing connections to the EMM database shortly after setting up NOM. Apparently the EMM database has a limit on the number of connections it wil; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-12/msg00263.html (10,818 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Andrew White" <adwhite AT inchix DOT net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:27:54 +1100; G'day, I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5? In what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and has anyone got it configured in a cluster? Cheers Andre; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00169.html (9,610 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:57:30 -0600; _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00170.html (10,700 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Boris Kraizman" <sysadminzone AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:41:47 +0100; YMMV, obviously. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewilts AT ewilts DOT org _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00171.html (11,964 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:01:42 +1100; YMMV, obviously. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewilts AT ewilts DOT org _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00174.html (11,961 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>; Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:08:37 -0700; And so it may be time again to have NOM and Aptare discussion. Could those who've been a supporter and user of each now chime in give us their current comparative opinions? Thanks, -sj >>> Dean <dean; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00175.html (12,480 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Andrew White" <adwhite AT inchix DOT net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:37:13 +1100; And so it may be time again to have NOM and Aptare discussion. Could those who've been a supporter and user of each now chime in give us their current comparative opinions? Thanks, -sj >>> Dean <dea; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00176.html (13,640 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: ckstehman AT pepco DOT com; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:52:38 -0500; We evaluated NOM when we upgraded to 6.0. We also use Aptare. We decided that with Apare we had no real need for NOM. Our brief experience showed it to be unstable. We have not looked at the 6.5 vers; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00189.html (12,500 bytes)
9. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:31:19 -0600; And so it may be time again to have NOM and Aptare discussion. Not really - they solve different problems. Aptare is a long-term reporting tool. It has almost no operational abilities. NOM, as its n; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00190.html (11,951 bytes)
10. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:21:19 -0600; On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> wrote: Ed, I'm interested to know how you think NOM contributed to problems on your master. Can you elaborate? We have an open case; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00194.html (12,631 bytes)
11. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Rosenkoetter, Gabriel" <Gabriel.Rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:29:55 -0500; Ed, if you don't have the EEB for NOM that fixes a memory leak (it's included in 6.5.3 and beyond), mention that in your case. I'd have brought this up at the quiz the wizards' session if I hadn't ha; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00196.html (12,248 bytes)
12. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Boris Kraizman" <sysadminzone AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:15:33 -0500; And so it may be time again to have NOM and Aptare discussion. Could those who've been a supporter and user of each now chime in give us their current comparative opinions? Thanks, -sj >>> Dean <dea; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00201.html (14,061 bytes)
13. Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5. (score: 1): Author: "Andrew White" <adwhite AT inchix DOT net>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:39:18 +1100; YMMV, obviously. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewilts AT ewilts DOT org _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-11/msg00208.html (11,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]