Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NFS\s+Backups\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor))
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:25:25 -0400
All, A group I support here is looking very heavily at a Sun Storagetek appliance like storage device that I've got to backup somehow. After seeing the NDMP price tag (we don't do any other NDMP here
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00426.html (9,747 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: David_Cornely at intuit.com (Cornely, David)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:41:27 -0700
So does this Storagetek appliance do snapshots? I'm not familiar with this piece of equipment but if it's similar to a NetApp appliance then you might want to consider both disk and tape backups. Dis
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00427.html (11,133 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: jpiszcz at lucidpixels.com (Justin Piszcz)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
With NDMP I have seen in the neighborhood of 25-40MB/s to an LTO-2 tape drive. However, I never tried backing up over NFS, there are a LOT of issues there, locking on an NFS mount, extremely slow spe
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00428.html (10,641 bytes)

4. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: Rajmund.Siwik at conexant.com (Rajmund Siwik)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:57:00 -0700
I did not really test that but I have some mixed environments NFS and NDMP. On average my ndmp is faster at least 10 to 20 times depending on kind of data being backed up. --Rajmund --Original Messag
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00430.html (11,270 bytes)

5. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: courtenay.jones at StockSupply.com (Jones, Courtenay)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:56:26 -0400
We have done something similar ... NDMP Enviroment: EMC NSX - holding gazillion of files NFS - HPUX 11.11 - holding gazillion of files (gazillion is a technical term there :) ) There is no question t
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00431.html (10,902 bytes)

6. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: HallC at SEC.GOV (Hall, Christian N.)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:20 -0400
Courtney, Just NFS shares, no CIFS from your NAS? How much data do you share to your hosts (NFS shares to clients)? What type of library are you using, and tape drives? We are looking at a similar co
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00434.html (12,024 bytes)

7. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:50:01 -0400
I'm unsure where the Linux box comes into play. If the appliance presents an NFS share, and you're going to back the appliance up via NFS, at the very least, I would mount the share ON one of your (*
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00435.html (12,524 bytes)

8. [Veritas-bu] NFS Backups (score: 1)
Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor))
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:36:51 -0400
Great idea Paul! The bulk of the data is going to be shared out to a single NFS server. So the plan was to test NFS --> Linux Server --> Media. If I can remember correctly, making that Media server a
/lists/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00437.html (13,539 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu