- 1. [Veritas-bu] De-DUP question (score: 1)
- Author: "Kohli, Vidit" <vidit.kohli AT blackrock DOT com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:51:42 -0400
- I believe by now lots of us either looked into new de-dup technology or even started using them. Please advise which ONE is good for enterprise level NetBackup 6.5 - can handle max number of data str
- /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00181.html (9,808 bytes)
- 2. [Veritas-bu] De-DUP question (score: 1)
- Author: tburrell <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:34:08 -0400
- Sorry, but I don't think it's realistic to find ONE best answer. Heck- we can't even all agree about one "best way" to configure Netbackup all by itself. There are just too many variables. You're goi
- /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00190.html (9,682 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Veritas-bu] De-DUP question (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:32:27 -0600
- I agree with Tom. An artical at http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Storage/Storage-Trends-in-2008-and-Beyond/ With the below: To improve backup, a company needs to address the whole ecosystem, Balaouras
- /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00196.html (11,833 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Veritas-bu] De-DUP question (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:04:03 -0400
- If there was exactly ONE that was the best for everybody, there would be only 1 product on the market. Obviously there are many, and there are many different approaches to how they work. In some case
- /lists/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00199.html (10,263 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu