Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+SOX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+SOX\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] SOX (score: 1): Author: "Ungaro, Matt" <mjungaro AT CAPITOLINDEMNITY DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:50:33 -0500; I know this isn't really Networker related, but if you're like me you have to wade through Sarbanes Oxley right now. My question is, what exactly is required for SOX as far as tape retention and test; /lists/html/Networker/2004-07/msg00355.html (8,903 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] SOX (score: 1): Author: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:58:31 -0500; Matt, We are in the middle of SOX stuff now too so I sympathize with you. It seems to me we're pretty much just making it up as we go along. Nobody here has brought up tape retention or testing yet a; /lists/html/Networker/2004-07/msg00362.html (10,466 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] SOX (score: 1): Author: Conrad Macina <conrad.macina AT PFIZER DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:20:58 -0400; As it's been explained to me, the SOX folks don't care what your procedures are, whether they're "necessary and sufficient", "generally recognized as safe", etc., just whether they're properly docume; /lists/html/Networker/2004-07/msg00368.html (12,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]