Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Questions\s+on\s+backing\s+up\s+hard\s+links\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Questions\s+on\s+backing\s+up\s+hard\s+links\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Questions on backing up hard links? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:22:22 -0400; Does anyone know how NetWorker handles the backup/recovery of hard links or how it's supposed to? I tested backing up two files (TEST and TEST.ln). TEST was approx 10 KB. The second file is a hard li; /lists/html/Networker/2005-08/msg00228.html (11,955 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Questions on backing up hard links? (score: 1): Author: "Brian O'Neill" <oneill AT OINC DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:22:26 -0400; Here is a bit of technical info on how hard links work on a "standard" UNIX filesystem (i.e. BSD type, although most others mimic this). Let's call each data object that would be stored on a filesyst; /lists/html/Networker/2005-08/msg00229.html (16,853 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Questions on backing up hard links? (score: 1): Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:31:56 -0700; As opposed to what? Not backing them up? Did you try recovering them both in the same session? I don't think that's correct. There have been some bugs associated with it in the past, but hard links; /lists/html/Networker/2005-08/msg00230.html (10,457 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Questions on backing up hard links? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:40:38 -0400; Not surprisingly, it turns out that I was not recovering all the affected files. If I recover all the files then they are recovered as hard links, same as before, but their inode numbers may differ r; /lists/html/Networker/2005-08/msg00254.html (13,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]