Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+NT\s+Cluster\s+License\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+NT\s+Cluster\s+License\s+issue\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: "Wood, R A (Bob)" <WoodR AT CHEVRONTEXACO DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:59:58 -0500; I think it is the way that Legato enforce their license policy. It seems that features are added to new releases and the licensing part is not fully enforced (maybe so that people can get to see the; /lists/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00334.html (13,684 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: Matts Nilsson <matts_nilsson AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:16:57 +0100; Hi! Assuming you're running Windows 2000 clusters, this is actually a M$ problem. It has to do with a bug with "gethostbyaddr", which makes the cluster report physical servers and virtual servers inc; /lists/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00356.html (16,188 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bradshaw (BTOpenWorld)" <notthehoople AT BTOPENWORLD DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:07:06 +0000; Hi Chris, I believe what is happening here is caused by Legato changing their cluster licensing policy. In NetWorker 5.x there was no difference between a Unix and a Windows cluster as far as licensi; /lists/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00359.html (12,207 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: Matts Nilsson <matts_nilsson AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:47:37 +0100; Mark, I know that Legato changed the cluster licensing for a while, but I believe that in 6.1.x, they've reverted to making no difference between NT/Linux/UNIX clusters again. As long as you have eno; /lists/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00380.html (14,080 bytes)
5. [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: Chris Adkisson <cadkisson AT BBANDT DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:08:06 -0500; I did a search in the archives and found a similar problem, but I wanted to throw this out to see if anyone knows about this. We upgraded a Networker 5.5.5 server to 6.1.2 a week and a half ago. Imme; /lists/html/Networker/2002-11/msg00450.html (10,084 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: "Maarten Boot (CWEU-USERS/CWNL)" <Maarten.Boot AT NL.COMPUWARE DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:49:03 +0100; The internal product numbers that legato uses for its cluster licenses between 5.5 and 6.x differ you need the correct licenses as of version 6. I would talk to your vendor or Legato about a trade in; /lists/html/Networker/2002-11/msg00452.html (12,007 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: "David E. Nelson" <david.nelson AT NI DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:29:34 -0600; Hi Chris, We've recently delved into this arena since we have a 2 node cluster. We're currently eval'ing 2133-1Y. You'll need 1 license for each physical node w/in a cluster. In a recent discussion w; /lists/html/Networker/2002-11/msg00457.html (12,041 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] NT Cluster License issue (score: 1): Author: Termfreak <networker2 AT FREENET DOT DE>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:16:21 +0100; to mine. -- Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html w; /lists/html/Networker/2002-11/msg00483.html (11,323 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]