- 1. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:14:44 +0200
- On 2006-07-31 14:27, Ballinger, John M revealed: We are the initial stages of doing such an evaluation. Since we know networker inside out, but got lost in the commvault GUI, I can't say for sure, bu
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00007.html (10,612 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: "Ballinger, John M" <john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:25:34 -0700
- Why are you moving to NetWorker. In my experience it's quite complicated but extremely flexible. Since we know NetWorker here fairly well we're beyond the learning curve. Is CommVault a true Enterpri
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00023.html (11,789 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Kay <Alex.Kay AT DLI.WA.GOV DOT AU>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:13:18 +0800
- [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] for a that We had a demo of CommVault a while back and, in a Windows environment, it has a number of out of the box advantages over Networker. In partic
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00056.html (13,183 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Stuart Whitby <swhitby AT DATAPROTECTORS.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:30:20 +0100
- Well, the disadvantage of having to check the index on every single file you want to back up to see if it already exists elsewhere is speed. Can you even imagine trying to do a restore in that scenar
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00057.html (15,152 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Shyam Hegde <hegde.shyam AT GMAIL DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:15:09 +0530
- Combination of EmailXtender and DiskXtender is a solution to look at if one needs Email Archives. But EX has very strict pre-requisites otherwise it would not work as expected. Always good to go thro
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00058.html (16,270 bytes)
- 6. [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Fazil Saiyed <fazil.saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:04:26 -0400
- Hello, We have had extensive discusions related to Commvault, it has many advantage over Networker. 1. Does have CLI that i have read about. 2. DR and replicated dB ( SQL) based is +. 3. Can resume b
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00059.html (10,798 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Siobhan Ellis <siobhanellis AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:32:52 +1000
- Best thing with Commvault is to really ask what is available NOW. They often talk about futures as if you can get them today. Siobhán Ellis --Original Message-- From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mai
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00060.html (18,455 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:00 -0400
- Best thing with Commvault is to really ask what is available NOW. They often talk about futures as if you can get them today. That's typical of software publishers. It seems like more information is
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00061.html (10,556 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Ruefenacht <craig.ruefenacht AT US.USANA DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:50:10 -0600
- Hi, I'll chime in on this discussion. I don't want to come across as bias toward Commvault - I've used Veritas, Legato, Commvault, Amanda, ARCserv, just about every backup system, and I think that th
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00068.html (14,385 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: Shyam Hegde <hegde.shyam AT GMAIL DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:44:06 +0530
- Hello Craig Ruefenacht, Your inputs are valuable as it's from a real user (no pre-sales!). Just out of curiosity, how do you manage the index/catalogues when it grows large with Commvault? -Shyam Hi,
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00071.html (15,334 bytes)
- 11. [Networker] CommVault vs NetWorker (score: 1)
- Author: "Ballinger, John M" <john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:27:05 -0700
- Anyone out there using/used CommVault. We are currently using NetWorker but are considering moving to CommVault. I'm still learning about it but apparently it has no command line interface. Thanks -
- /lists/html/Networker/2006-07/msg00385.html (9,230 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu