Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Restoring\s+large\s+directory\s+does\s+not\s+work\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Restoring\s+large\s+directory\s+does\s+not\s+work\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:07:05 -0700; Trying to restore files using bconsole: * restore client=client1-fd fileset=Client1-Fileset select current all done. It does the 'select', 'current', and 'all' but sits there on the 'done' part. I h; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00430.html (11,653 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:31:07 -0400; 2009/6/23 mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>: Are you running out of memory on the director, database or client machine? John -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users ma; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00431.html (12,169 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:13:13 -0700; John, The dir and database are on the same machine and memory is not a problem. I tried a partial restore - it restores files but not recursively. Meaning no subdirectories. Then I tried restoring th; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00435.html (10,958 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:13:54 -0700; Although the cpu is pinged at 100% Yudhvir The dir and database are on the same machine and memory is not a problem. -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacul; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00436.html (11,172 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:09:57 -0700; Did you wait till the cpu went back to low cpu usage? No, it stays high overnight and my patience runs out before cpu pegging does. Depending on your configuration and optimization of your database; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00439.html (13,362 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: Bruno Friedmann <bruno AT ioda-net DOT ch>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:42:52 +0200; I'm pretty sure that a postgresql server running with so low memory 27484 pgsql 1 4 0 54668K 37488K sbwait 0 1:20 0.00% postgres could give a suffisant throughput. 54MB tend to indicate a default deb; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00441.html (13,314 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:30:07 +0100; I suggest attaching gdb to the bacula-dir process to see what it is doing, e.g. thread apply all bt Then detach gdb, let it run some more, and do the above again to see how it differs. You might nee; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00448.html (11,814 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:35:26 -0700; I got into gdb but know very little how to move around in there. I tried: [root@lucifer ~]# gdb /usr/local/sbin/bacula-dir 27410 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freeb; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00455.html (13,575 bytes)
9. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:41:03 -0700; (gdb) thread apply all bt Thread 4 (Thread 0x801902180 (LWP 100350)): #0 0x00000008016f98cc in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x00000008009078c5 in nanosleep () from /lib/libthr.so.3 #2 0x000; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00456.html (12,275 bytes)
10. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:07 +0100; The function add_findex is interesting, but I think like your bacula-dir was compiled without debugging info so it is difficult to see what is happening. Try the following gdb commands (I assume you; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00459.html (13,318 bytes)
11. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:59:26 -0700; Thanks for all your help you guys. I am impressed with the level of expertise here! The function add_findex is interesting, but I think like your bacula-dir was Try the following gdb commands (I assu; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00462.html (14,094 bytes)
12. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:25:10 +0100; OK, this shows why it is slow. The algorithm in add_findex is only efficient when called with consecutive index values (the third number printed). The code for "restore all" in 2.4.4 doesn't do that; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00494.html (15,022 bytes)
13. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:26 -0700; Thanks Martin, You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula, will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update table scripts. I am on postgresq; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00530.html (12,577 bytes)
14. Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work (score: 1): Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:30:44 +0100; Sorry, I don't know. Check the version table in the catalog. The latest Bacula uses version 11, so if your version table is the same then there should be no need to run update scripts. __Martin -- _; /lists/html/Bacula-users/2009-06/msg00531.html (11,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]