- 1. [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:23:09 -0400
- I'm almost ready with putting bacula into production but I'm still debugging a few things and one of them is the "Device" line in my bacula mail reports, and I was hoping someone could help me with t
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00408.html (11,315 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:38:55 -0400
- It isn't necessary. jbod1-drive-1, jbod1-drive-2, etc. are virtual drives. The ArchiveDevice path in each virtual drive contains a symlink. The symlink is created by vchanger to point to the folder c
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00413.html (14,366 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:38:40 -0400
- Ah, ok... so all these months I have been looking at this the wrong way! I didn't realize bacula was telling me what "virtual drive" it was using, I thought it was telling me what drive bacula "think
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00438.html (10,691 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:05:22 -0400
- Well, not all of them. You need to define at least one, and you probably want several. It depends on the level of concurrency used, which depends on the maximum write throughput of the JBOD device, a
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00442.html (13,755 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:14:39 -0400
- I've had concurrent backups working fine for the past few days, this morning I login to check my server and I noticed that bacula/vchanger is only using 2 of my 4 virtual drives. I don't understand w
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00113.html (11,003 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:44:40 -0400
- Very strange. Most of today my server was using only 2 of 4 virtual drives. Now, all 4 drives are back to being in use. :-\ -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuabl
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00127.html (9,463 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:52:55 -0400
- Did any of the jobs that ran just after those two write to the same volume? What was the status (from 'status dir' command) of the jobs that were not running when only two jobs were running? My under
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00137.html (12,923 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:11 -0400
- Sorry, I probably should have cut and pasted that information. All the jobs have finished, but I believe they all said something like "waiting on storage device", if it happens again, I will make sur
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00141.html (11,100 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:30:26 -0400
- No, whitespace does not matter, and Bacula would tell you if there were a config error. Maybe there were jobs already running when you issued the reload command in bconsole to bring in the config cha
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00147.html (11,004 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Bacula-users] Device (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:33:40 -0400
- I have not tried an actual restart of all daemons yet, I've only been issuing "reload"s, restarting the SD and DIR has been on my to do list for a few days.. I've been waiting on my current backups t
- /lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00151.html (10,445 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu