Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+overlapping\s+BackupPC

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+overlapping\s+BackupPC_nightlys\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tony Schreiner <schreian AT bc DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:10:13 -0400; On one of my BackupPC setups, I back a lot of data. On occasion things run for more than 24 hours and I start getting .... Botch on admin job for admin : already in use!! messages in the log file. I'; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00190.html (11,037 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tino Schwarze <backuppc.lists AT tisc DOT de>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:30:13 +0200; Just set $Conf{BackupPCNightlyPeriod} = 2; Or 4 or whatever. That way, BackupPC_nightly will do only a part of the pool each run. Bye, Tino, having that setting at 4. -- What we resist, persists. (Ze; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00191.html (11,757 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tony Schreiner <schreian AT bc DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:41:53 -0400; Sorry, I replied first to Tino; here it is again to the list: I can do that, yes, But the BackupPC_nightly actually do complete, even when 3 or 4 get run in succession. I'm just wondering if the 2nd; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00192.html (12,326 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tino Schwarze <backuppc.lists AT tisc DOT de>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:16:16 +0200; There are two settings for BackupPC_nightly: BackupPCNightlyPeriod and MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs. My experience is that it makes no sense to set MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs to anything higher than 1 since th; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00193.html (13,942 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Craig Barratt <cbarratt AT users.sourceforge DOT net>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:01:34 -0700; Yes, this is a bug - it should skip queuing the next BackupPC_nightly if one is running. As Tino points out you can get BackupPC_nightly to take less time each night. Craig -- This SF.net email is sp; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00195.html (11,560 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Craig Barratt <cbarratt AT users.sourceforge DOT net>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:02:05 -0700; Tino, Very good explanation. One minor comment... Actually any new file is linked immediately if it exists in the pool. Rsync additionally can avoid transferring the file (or transfer just the change; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00196.html (12,135 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: dan <dandenson AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:10:35 -0600; Actually any new file is linked immediately if it exists in the pool. Rsync additionally can avoid transferring the file (or transfer just the changes to file) provided a file with the exact same pa; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00197.html (14,383 bytes)
8. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tony Schreiner <schreian AT bc DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:32:47 -0400; As I originally said, it happens occasionally, not all the time. It usually only happens during a full backup of one of the larger clients, which I do on a 28 day interval. It's a big backup setup. T; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00198.html (12,608 bytes)
9. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Dill <jonathan AT nerds DOT net>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:58:55 -0400; How much memory does the server have? Just a guess, but especially if you are using rsync, you could be running into problems with the size of the "list" that rsync has to maintain in memory, and rsy; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00203.html (13,484 bytes)
10. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tino Schwarze <backuppc.lists AT tisc DOT de>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:13:02 +0200; I've "educated" my users the hard way. We've got home directories with quotas set up. Then we've got a temporary "exchange" directory. Every file not changed within the last 14 days is removed by a n; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00204.html (12,101 bytes)
11. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Tony Schreiner <schreian AT bc DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:34:11 -0400; I don't want to impose quotas, as appealing an idea as that sounds. The machines are for grant funded work by a relatively small number of total users. There are legitimate reasons for them to be gen; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00206.html (12,858 bytes)
12. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Dill <jonathan AT nerds DOT net>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:31:59 -0400; Very good, that sounds adequate, more cores and more RAM on the server could still help a bit, or an additional server or two (but again budget) but sounds like not the main cause of the problem. Sou; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00208.html (14,382 bytes)
13. Re: [BackupPC-users] overlapping BackupPC_nightlys (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Dill <jonathan AT nerds DOT net>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:52:43 -0400; I used to work in an academic biotech lab for over 10 years, and I can vouch for that volume of data, this is not just Word docs and e-mail and such. The data is what really makes them their money to; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2008-04/msg00209.html (13,151 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]