Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Outsourcing\s+backup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Outsourcing\s+backup\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 12:27:22 +0200 (CEST); Hello, Can you see a problem in this thinking : We have two business building not connected between them. Servers are not the same. I would like outsourcing data. Backups are done on two Ethernet HDD; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00020.html (11,112 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:38:57 +0200 (CEST); I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 GB. ____________________________________________________ Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, les; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00021.html (12,754 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 07:50:15 -0500; With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). The bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend on; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00022.html (10,722 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 07:19:32 -0500; If you have decent internet connectivity, why not set up a vpn between servers so they can both access both LANs all the time and take care of themselves? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00023.html (11,587 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Kameleon <kameleon25 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:21:59 -0500; With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). The bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend o; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00024.html (13,071 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:55:05 +0200 (CEST); I will test it (but I want a full backup every week). We have a connection with 250 KB/s. My goal is not to centralize backups so I wondered if my solution will be good. Imagine if the company burns; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00025.html (14,448 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Kameleon <kameleon25 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:15:43 -0500; What I would do is this: Setup backuppc for company A at the company B location Setup backuppc for company B at the company A location That way you will have total failover redundancy with no "lost w; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00026.html (16,907 bytes)
8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:37:24 -0500; What I'm suggesting is that you have two complete servers, each backing up both locations, and probably nightly instead of weekly if you have the usual amount of idle time at night. Assuming that it; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00027.html (12,246 bytes)
9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:38:52 +0200 (CEST); It's a very good idea. But with this solution I am forced to do a single full then incrementals. And I'm not sure the speed of upload will be sufficient. And configure BackupPC with : FullPeriod = -1; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00028.html (18,492 bytes)
10. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Kameleon <kameleon25 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:25:15 -0500; 250k is plenty for this scenario. We run nightly incrementals with weekly fulls on all of our servers including the 4 remote sites. The 2 slowest of our remotes are 256k up and that is still suffici; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00029.html (19,975 bytes)
11. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Erik Hjertén <erik.hjerten AT companion DOT se>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 17:42:08 +0200; With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). The bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend on; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00030.html (11,919 bytes)
12. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:08:51 -0500; Rsync full backups still only transfer the differences from the last full. They run slower than incrementals because they do a block checksum comparison even on unchanged files, but don't take a lot; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00031.html (12,090 bytes)
13. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:13:20 -0500; Smb/tar methods fulls transfer the entire content. Rsync methods compare the previous full to the current content and only transfer the differences. The difference between rsync fulls and incremental; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00032.html (12,037 bytes)
14. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 18:43:28 +0200 (CEST); I will look at how much data changes each day. I'm perplexed though your solution seems the best. ____________________________________________________ Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, r; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00033.html (22,019 bytes)
15. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 19:01:22 +0200 (CEST); I can do a full backup that I archive and incremental rsync every night. Why not if the rate of change in the content it's good. I will look at how much data changes each day. _______________________; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00034.html (14,312 bytes)
16. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Rob Owens <rowens AT ptd DOT net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 18:02:14 -0400; <snip> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd recommend setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to minimize your bandwidth usage. I have used the setup Les describes, with In; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00035.html (12,448 bytes)
17. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: "Boniforti Flavio" <flavio AT piramide DOT ch>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:36:52 +0200; Hello people. I'm popping into this thread because I'm also running "outsourced backups" (me calling them "remote backups"). I'm successfully running a backuppc server at my office, which is backing; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00036.html (12,990 bytes)
18. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:29:29 +0200 (CEST); Hello, Maybe increase Full period if you use rsync ? ____________________________________________________ Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, les photos et les vidé; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00037.html (14,842 bytes)
19. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Inno <innop AT voila DOT fr>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:34:15 +0200 (CEST); And as Rob say : ____________________________________________________ Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, les photos et les vidéos : http://evenementiel.voila.fr/No; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00038.html (11,627 bytes)
20. Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup (score: 1): Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:36:35 +1000; Enable checksum-caching, modify IncrLevels so that you don't re-transfer more and more data during each incremental. Also, I frequently add bwlimit to rsync so it doesn't 'flood' the remote link duri; /lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00039.html (14,314 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]