Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+upgrade\s+of\s+200\s+GB\s+DB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+upgrade\s+of\s+200\s+GB\s+DB\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Daad Ali <daad_l AT YAHOO DOT CA>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:20:43 -0400; I am planning to upgrade my 200 GB TSM 5.2.6 Database to 5.4 Does anyone have any estimate on how long that will take? I do realise there are many other variables but wondering how long it will take; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00215.html (9,504 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Kathleen M Hallahan <Kathleen_Hallahan AT FREDDIEMAC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:49:11 -0400; It took us less than 45 minutes for the upgrade from 5.2.3.1 to 5.4.0.3. Our database is nearly 470GB although it's currently at 28% utilized (yes, I know, it's a long story...), and runs on a P650.; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00216.html (11,019 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Greg Yuzik <gyuzik AT ARCRESOURCES DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:45:18 -0600; I just complete a similar size upgrade from 5.3.8 to 5.4.0. The upgrade itself took maybe 30 minutes on a 240 GB database (70% utilized). However upon starting up the server, an error was in the acti; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00217.html (10,585 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:04:11 -0500; There is a lesson here: do not perform an upgrade to any code (TSM or otherwise) until there is at least one maintenance level available, unless there is a specific reason to use a patch level to fix; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00218.html (10,381 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Kathleen M Hallahan <Kathleen_Hallahan AT FREDDIEMAC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:24:05 -0400; Oh, understood; we're normally the last people to go to new code. A combination of circumstances here more or less forced our hand this time. I suppose someone has to report problems to the list firs; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00220.html (11,040 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Adrian Pardo <apardo AT TECSYSTEM.COM DOT AR>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:15:42 -0300; Take care because if the database has some errors the upgrade could take forever trying to upgrade it!!! Verify the base previously to avoid such inconvenience Adrian Carlos Pardo IBM Certified Deplo; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00222.html (11,124 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:25:24 +1000; Kathleen I had a client that I upgraded to 5.4 and consistently one of the TDP for SQL instances refuses to terminate - the backup works correctly but the session hangs around for ever - even after t; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00231.html (10,675 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Peter Jones <peter.jones AT COMPUTING-SERVICES.OXFORD.AC DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:34:15 +0100; Hi, Search for PK43462 as fixed in 5.4.1.0 at: http://www.ibm.com/software/support/ The problems you are both experiencing sound very similar. Hope this helps, Pete -- Peter Jones Oxford University C; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00343.html (10,233 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] upgrade of 200 GB DB (score: 1): Author: Kathleen M Hallahan <Kathleen_Hallahan AT FREDDIEMAC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:42:14 -0400; Yep, I'm actually waiting for a copy job to finish so that we can put that version on our problem server this morning. Fingers crossed... _________________________________ Kathleen Hallahan Freddie M; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00345.html (10,716 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]