Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+separation\s+of\s+copypool\s+tapes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+separation\s+of\s+copypool\s+tapes\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: "Haberstroh, Debbie (IT)" <HABERDE AT VOUGHTAIRCRAFT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:02:08 -0500; We have a large database, 170Gb and are proposing to our customer that it be separated into multiple servers. Unfortunately when the system was designed, more than half of the nodes were directed to; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00162.html (11,026 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Andy Huebner <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:09 -0500; When we rearranged our tape pools, we did a move node. We did not look for a way to move the tape because we where changing tape technology. Recreating the copy pool is easy; a backup storage pool to; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00163.html (12,461 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: "Haberstroh, Debbie (IT)" <HABERDE AT VOUGHTAIRCRAFT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:14:48 -0500; Deleting all of my copypool volumes could be a problem since I am only moving half of the tapepool data and have over 600 copypool tapes. I will need to find a better way to remove the data. Thanks f; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00165.html (13,090 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Andy Huebner <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:45:24 -0500; When we move single nodes to balance the pools, we run this query to locate tapes with the moved node's data and delete them a few at a time allowing backup storage pool to recreate the tapes with th; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00166.html (14,266 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: "Haberstroh, Debbie (IT)" <HABERDE AT VOUGHTAIRCRAFT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:29:11 -0500; Excellent, thanks. If I try to move nodedata before the new diskpool is in place, which would have migrated off to the new tapepool, will the node have issues after it's backup when it tries to migra; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00168.html (14,550 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:23:04 -0400; Deleting all of my copypool volumes could be a problem since I am only moving half of the tapepool data and have over 600 copypool tapes. I will need to find a better way to remove the data. Thanks; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00171.html (10,532 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick.laflamme AT NIST DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:00:31 -0400; Deleting all of my copypool volumes could be a problem since I am only moving half of the tapepool data and have over 600 copypool tapes. I will need to find a better way to remove the data. Thanks; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00177.html (11,793 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Andy Huebner <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:40:19 -0500; I must respectfully disagree. The only relationships between a primary pool and a copy pool is the command backup storage pool or if you use the option for simultaneous writes to the copy pool. In my; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00179.html (11,500 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:43:05 -0400; Deleting all of my copypool volumes could be a problem since I am only moving half of the tapepool data and have over 600 copypool tapes. I will need to find a better way to remove the data. Thanks; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00180.html (12,190 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] separation of copypool tapes (score: 1): Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:28:14 -0400; One relatively minor change to Richard's statement -- I've seen the same thing -- as long as the data is in a primary pool, it hasn't expired. If it hasn't expired, it won't automatically fall off th; /lists/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00181.html (12,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]