- 1. vpn virtual addresses (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenney, John" <jkenney AT jhancock DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:11:14 -0500
- We have a Cisco VPN3030 concentrator installed on our network. When someone establishes a session he/she is assigned an address in a pool from n.n.n.11 to n.n.n.254. We have put a negative entry in o
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-11/msg00301.html (11,045 bytes)
- 2. Re: vpn virtual addresses (score: 1)
- Author: "Leslie Clark" <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:01:41 -0500
- The seedfile entries are to prevent the discovery of nodes. You cannot prevent the discovery of interfaces on a node if any interface on that node qualifies it for discovery. Netview is intent on giv
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-11/msg00310.html (13,258 bytes)
- 3. Re: vpn virtual addresses (score: 1)
- Author: "Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:26:20 -0600
- Jack, Does the VPN address get added to the Cisco concentrator as an interface? I think the ! in the netmon seed file keep you from discovering new nodes through those interfaces if it found those in
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-11/msg00319.html (14,310 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu