- 1. Re: tcpserver (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:37:47 -0500 (EST)
- xinetd works quite well, and is much more secure than inetd. And with ipchains (or your firewall of choice) able to only allow access to/from amanda clients... ISTR a dicussion of tcpserver in the ar
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00606.html (10,940 bytes)
- 2. Re: tcpserver (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg A. Woods" <woods AT weird DOT com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:50:42 -0500 (EST)
- [ On Monday, February 24, 2003 at 12:37:47 (-0500), Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: ] Perhaps for some folks, but certianly not for all! Note also that for all intents and proposes xinetd is an inetd. I s
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00635.html (11,822 bytes)
- 3. RE: tcpserver (score: 1)
- Author: Casey Shobe <cshobe AT secureworks DOT com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:36:46 -0500
- Well, I'm using xinetd as a (hopefully) temporary solution. The security issues are my primary concern for not wanting to use it. I prefer to run everything as a standalone daemon if possible (i.e. s
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00638.html (13,809 bytes)
- 4. RE: tcpserver (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg A. Woods" <woods AT weird DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 01:08:30 -0500 (EST)
- [ On Monday, February 24, 2003 at 19:36:46 (-0500), Casey Shobe wrote: ] I don't know what kind of security you might be talking about, but for most purposes running one master internet daemon to han
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00644.html (12,696 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu