Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tar\s+versions\s+\(was\s+Re\:\s+\"implausibly\s+old\s+time\s+stamp\"\)\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Jolk <alexj AT buf DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:57:43 +0200
Perhaps no postings about the specific problem, but lots where the response was to use 1.13.25, 1.13.19, or maybe 1.14.1. Latter one is fairly new, so "my" jury is still out deliberating :) BTW I ha
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00426.html (14,716 bytes)

2. Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie AT rfa DOT org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:14:44 -0400
Did you compile from source or use the debian package from sid? -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 200
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00429.html (15,150 bytes)

3. Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Jolk <alexj AT buf DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:20:14 +0200
Did you compile from source or use the debian package from sid? I compiled from source and installed tar into a different location. Now if only one could specify which tar to use for amrecover, that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00434.html (14,395 bytes)

4. Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:47:29 +0200
Did you compile from source or use the debian package from sid? I compiled from source and installed tar into a different location. Now if only one could specify which tar to use for amrecover, that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00436.html (15,425 bytes)

5. Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:34:22 -0400
Without checking, depending on others :(, I presume amrecover uses runtar too. But needs be run as root anyway, no? Might a special case be possible for amrecover? -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00438.html (14,443 bytes)

6. Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp") (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:34:31 +0200
Making that one configurable at run time would be easy, but it would also mean that the suid-root program that invokes tar can be tricked into executing anything you like, giving root privileges to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-05/msg00476.html (15,357 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu