Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tape\s+storage\s+vs\.\s+disk\s+storage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tape\s+storage\s+vs\.\s+disk\s+storage\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Mark Rizzo <RizzoM AT MAIL.DEC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 09:32:46 -0500; Ron, Did you say "counter-intuitive"? Well that's exactly how we felt until we got our hands on a document titled, ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager Version 2 Release 1.5 Performance Evaluation Repo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00008.html (13,745 bytes)
2. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 09:48:42 -0500; Can you tell us please the publication number on that report? I would like to get a copy.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00046.html (14,609 bytes)
3. tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Michael Castillo <mcastill AT UTEP DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 10:37:07 -0700; Does anyone out there just dump to tape only and not store data on disk(ex.3390,3380)? Can this be done? Michael A.Castillo Software Systems Specialist Ph:747-5256 Fax:747-5067 Beeper :546-3756 E-Mai; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00517.html (10,987 bytes)
4. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Rick Tsujimoto <rtsujimoto AT CUSA.CANON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:04:30 EST; Yes, this can be done and this is how we do backups. *--* * Rick Tsujimoto * * * * rtsujimoto AT cusa.canon DOT com * * * * tel: 516-328-4554 * * fax: 516-328-4369 * *--* Does anyone out there just d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00520.html (11,797 bytes)
5. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: MATTHEW SPARKS 05-025 <MSPARKS AT PINKERTONS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 11:19:24 -0800; The drawback to this is you are limited to one machine per tape drive at a time, with disk you can have multiple machines backing up simultaneously. Matthew Makaala Sparks Desk (818) 380-8712 Senior; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00524.html (12,948 bytes)
6. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Tom Bell <bell AT WAII DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:54:50 -0600; Yes, we use a small RS6000 to drive our 3494 and 3590s. We have just enough local disk for the ADSM database. All of our backup and archive copygroups point to locally defined single-level (no migra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00526.html (11,630 bytes)
7. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Dianne Sharp <DSHARP AT CLEAR.CO DOT NZ>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:00:44 +1200; When we first installed ADSM, I did a test backup directly to cartridge by setting up a Management Class of CARTRIDGE, to which I bound certain files. In the copy group for this Management class, I h; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00532.html (12,236 bytes)
8. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Khiem Phan <kphan1 AT TANDY DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 12:44:37 -0600; Michael, Yes, it can be done.....just setup the tape storage pool. you must have ample tape drives available . Khiem 817 870-0460; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00536.html (11,979 bytes)
9. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Bradley King <king AT MONTROUGE.GM.SLB DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 09:58:21 +0100; I too agree that it can be done but... I used to do it like that but now I put a 1GB disk buffer between all of my clients and the tape drives. I have much faster backup response and as someone else; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00540.html (11,720 bytes)
10. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: Mark Rizzo <RizzoM AT MAIL.DEC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:03:33 -0500; Michael, You can go directly to your tape drive but you must realize, your backups/archives will backup (queue) if you don't have enough tape drives. While a disk backup pool can handle many backups; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00586.html (12,504 bytes)
11. Re: tape storage vs. disk storage (score: 1): Author: "Clendenny, Ronald D." <rdclendenny AT CAL.UE DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:34:59 -0600; Now why would there be an increase in the data transfer rate going direct to tape? That seems counter-intuitive. Was migration competing with the backup? Ron Clendenny <rdclendenny AT cal.ue DOT com>; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-03/msg00605.html (13,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]