Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*should\s+I\s+define\s+two\s+standalone\s+3590s\s+as\s+two\s+libraries\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*should\s+I\s+define\s+two\s+standalone\s+3590s\s+as\s+two\s+libraries\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Roger Stakkestad <rogers AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:41:38 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:41:14 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:41:14 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00049.html (11,835 bytes)
2. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Odd Magne Sekkingstad <oddmagne AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:41:36 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:39:36 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:39:36 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00050.html (11,859 bytes)
3. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Odd Magne Sekkingstad <oddmagne AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:41:37 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:41:14 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:41:14 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00051.html (11,891 bytes)
4. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harald Engen <Tom.Harald.Engen AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 16:05:19 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:53:51 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:53:51 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00053.html (11,863 bytes)
5. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Roger Stakkestad <rogers AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:56:52 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:54:18 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:54:18 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00054.html (11,790 bytes)
6. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harald Engen <Tom.Harald.Engen AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 16:05:15 +0000; Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:51:04 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 31, 1999 15:51:04 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg00055.html (11,886 bytes)
7. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Lindsay Morris <lmorris AT OPENMIC DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 09:20:24 -0600; I have ADSM 3.1.10.0 on AIX 4.1.3.0, and two 3590 drives, scsi-attached. First, I gather I should put the 3590s in random mode, so they'll act like little 10-tape libraries. Great. Now, if I define t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01329.html (11,250 bytes)
8. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Roger Stakkestad <rogers AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:37:24 +0000; Status Distribution January 30, 1999 15:35:19 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 30, 1999 15:35:19 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01339.html (11,549 bytes)
9. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harald Engen <Tom.Harald.Engen AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:37:22 +0000; Status Distribution January 30, 1999 15:35:19 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 30, 1999 15:35:19 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01340.html (11,576 bytes)
10. should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? (score: 1): Author: Odd Magne Sekkingstad <oddmagne AT NO.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:37:24 +0000; Status Distribution January 30, 1999 15:35:19 The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?" sent on January 30, 1999 15:35:19 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Nat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01341.html (11,518 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]