You must be running VM/ESA 1.2.0 or 1.2.1, right, Steve? I just found out this afternoon an open APAR, VM57805, addresses this problem on VM/ESA 1.1 systems; it's a problem with VMFSIMPC not handling
Author: "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE AT UBVM.CC.BUFFALO DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 16:40:52 EST
Right you are, Nick. I guess staying current has as many rewards as it might have problems (...the bleeding edge). Although, being on the latest release of ESA these days has meant more stability, a
I am confused by the following apar. It is marked CLOSED PER but when one looks at the PTF section, it says no PTF planned. Then later in the text, one is told to apply the PTF. "* RECOMMENDATION: Ap
On Wed, 26 Jan 1994 18:24:58 EST, Leonard Boyle <SNOLEN AT VM.SAS DOT COM>, wrote: I also was confused when I saw this. So I opened a PMR to complain. The way ADSM service works is via "level-sets".
Author: "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE AT UBVM.CC.BUFFALO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 10:51:33 EST
This sounds as though the ADSM folks have been infected somewhat by the TCPIP folks... :-( I just received my ADSM shipment, and it came with two maintenance tapes, one for installation via INSTFPP,
Author: Nick Laflamme <NLAFLAMM AT VMA.CC.ND DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 11:12:55 EST
Odds are, Steve, that your SES format tape may not load even with the first SES process fix on. My VMFREC wouldn't complete; some internal command was getting an RC 88 that ADSM level 2 isn't familia
We're running VM/ESA 2.1 as well. I installed ADSM without SES. I was a baaaad boy (in my best Costello voice). I read the install exec and after all was said and done it looked to me like it just di
Author: "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE AT UBVM.CC.BUFFALO DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 10:48:45 EST
Well, I just recieved and applied the "latest" level-set PTF without problems (UN53328). Steve (tkssteve AT ubvm.cc.buffalo DOT edu | [email protected] | (716)645-3564)