Author: Peter Kunst <Peter.Kunst AT csksoftware DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:14:10 +0200
Hi, just migrating and testing how amanda goes on my setup, and i really like the level 0,1,... scheduling algorithm. However, after adding more and more partitions, i've tried to force a level 0 to
Q. What if `amdump' reports `dumps way too big, must skip incremental dumps'? A. It means Amanda couldn't back up some disk because it wouldn't fit in the tape(s) you have configured Amanda to use. I
Author: Peter Kunst <Peter.Kunst AT csksoftware DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:33:35 +0200
[..] Got it. Still not understand why all my level 0 stuff would fit on 2 tapes, and my runtapes says "2" and amanda refuses. All disks have been dumped fine already, thanks to dumplevel scheduling.
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:37:02 -0400
Aamnda is not designed to do the all-full situation at all. It *can* be forced is there is sufficient tape capacity and you allow runtapes to be whatever will hold it, in your case probably no less t
This sounded like you just added a bunch of new ones. IIRC, an LTO-1 holds a maximum of 100GB. Even with runtapes 2, it will be hard pressed to fit 400GB in one dump. Is amanda using the second tape
Author: Peter Kunst <Peter.Kunst AT csksoftware DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:52:14 +0200
I've migrated some partitions to amanda once per week, starting some weeks ago. Now that all stuff goes to amanda i wanted to see what happens when i schedule a full over all partitions in one run. Y
... Repeating and rearranging a couple of lines: To me, this says 26 DLE's were successfully written to the first tape including 180GB of valid, properly written data. It then tried the 27th DLE and