Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*out\s+of\s+tape\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*out\s+of\s+tape\s+\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Tony <td_miles AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 04:49:27 +0100 (BST); Hi, I am using Amanda to back up 4 machines to a 20/40 DDS4 (DAT) tape in one of the machines. I am doing a full backup every night as there is not a lot of data on all of the machines (they are appl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00088.html (14,170 bytes)
2. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:50:29 -0400; That looks to be the problem, unless ??? I'm surprised HW compression expands it that much. You are using DDS-4 tapes, not DDS-{123} ones right? Try it next run without software compression. 25GB sho; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00090.html (16,079 bytes)
3. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Tony <td_miles AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 06:36:41 +0100 (BST); Hi Jon, Thanks for the response. Definitely DDS4 tapes (we have never had DDS drives before, so there is no possibility of old tapes getting mixed in). I tried it without software compression (my fir; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00092.html (15,402 bytes)
4. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 01:00:55 -0500; --On Monday, October 06, 2003 06:36:41 +0100 Tony <td_miles AT yahoo DOT com> wrote: So what was on the 'taper' line of the report ? It should look something like: taper: tape archive07 kb 43505184 f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00093.html (17,361 bytes)
5. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Tony <td_miles AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 07:43:29 +0100 (BST); Hi Frank, Thanks for your response, see comments inline. regards, Tony. -- Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com> wrote: > --On Monday, October 06, 2003 06:36:41 +0100 Tony For the one using softwar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00094.html (13,233 bytes)
6. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 05:59:07 -0400; But what percentage of that is reserved for degraded mode incrementals? The default is 100, i.e. you are not using it for full dumps. If you ONLY do full dumps you should reserve 0. And your largest; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00099.html (14,448 bytes)
7. RE: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: "Amanda Admin" <amanda AT denverdata DOT com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:05:18 -0600; Tony, I didn't see in your earlier postings what OS you're running, but I'm guessing linux. For my Redhat tape-server with HP DAT drives (1 DDS-2, 1 DDS-3) the mt command is "mt -f /dev/st0 datcompr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00117.html (12,057 bytes)
8. Re: out of tape ?? (score: 1): Author: JC Simonetti <simonetti AT echo DOT fr>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:30:19 +0200; Hi! "mt" can turn on and off the hardware compression (take your man to see if it's "compression" or "datcompression", it differs from mt versions), but is not able to tell you whether the compressio; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00118.html (13,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]