Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*multi\s+drive\s+restore\s+failing\s+with\s+\"disk\s+full\s+condition\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*multi\s+drive\s+restore\s+failing\s+with\s+\"disk\s+full\s+condition\"\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: "Bates, Richard" <Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 08:45:51 -0500; ADSM client: 3.1.0.6 (NT 4.0) ADSM server: 3.1.2.40 (AIX 4.1.5) One of my clients recently performed a restore using the GUI. They clicked on the machine name in the GUI and all drives were selected; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00346.html (12,780 bytes)
2. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:58:12 -0500; Computers do what humans tell them to (well, most of the time). The ADSM GUI is wont to auto-select the names of file systems which were very recently backed up, as an apparent convenience for Resto; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00347.html (11,962 bytes)
3. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: "Bates, Richard" <Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 09:09:59 -0500; Richard, I don' t understand. The user wanted both the c: and the d: restored. However when both drives were selected at the same time the restore process restored everything to just one drive the c:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00348.html (13,437 bytes)
4. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: "Remeta, Mark" <MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 09:16:17 -0500; I think that when you click on restore to original location, and then select multiple file systems, it blindly restores all the selections to the 'first' original location. While I can see the logic; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00349.html (11,925 bytes)
5. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: Bates, Richard [mailto:Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:36:16 -0500; Richard, I don' t understand. The user wanted both the c: and the d: restored. However when both drives were selected at the same time the restore process restored everything to just one drive the c:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00350.html (13,309 bytes)
6. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 09:16:12 -0500; Actually what I would have done to speed things up would be open one window with a command line interface (dsmc) and started the restore of C: then opened another window and started a restore of D: i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00351.html (14,649 bytes)
7. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 09:30:31 -0500; Richard - What came across in your posting was that your user did not notice that the C: and D: drives were pre-selected in the GUI, and ended up with a big mess as both ended up restored to the sam; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00353.html (12,599 bytes)
8. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: Andy Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:58:54 -0800; If the user selected the option to "restore to original location", then it definitely is not working correctly. APAR IC25554 documents this problem, which exists in both the Version 3.1 and 3.7 clien; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00358.html (12,354 bytes)
9. Re: multi drive restore failing with "disk full condition" (score: 1): Author: "Bates, Richard" <Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:52:03 -0500; Andy, Many thanks for the reply. At least I can tell the customer that something is being done about it. You mention APARs. Is there any website where we can search and track the progress of APARS. R; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00365.html (13,920 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]