Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*lots\s+of\s+log\s+files\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*lots\s+of\s+log\s+files\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Paul Yeatman <pyeatman AT mamacass.ucsd DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:37:15 -0700; Do people routinely clean up the log directory? I'm up to about 82 gigs. I think it is time. Do I really care about log "log.20060512.0" anymore? Paul; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00092.html (11,034 bytes)
2. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:11:44 -0400; Wow! Amanda, by design, is supposed to clean those up when the tape is over-written, and generally has done that here over the last 7 or 8 years. You may want to look at your install, make sure these; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00093.html (11,744 bytes)
3. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:16:46 -0400; Those logfiles are Amanda's tape catalog. Amanda should be cleaning out the logs that correspond to overwritten tapes. Do you have tapes that old? Dustin -- Storage Software Engineer http://www.zmand; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00094.html (11,485 bytes)
4. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:54:38 +0200; If you remove those files manually, than Amanda cannot locate older backups anymore with "amadmin x find". When Amanda does not need them anymore, Amanda moves them to the subdir "oldlog". And only f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00095.html (12,766 bytes)
5. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Paul Yeatman <pyeatman AT mamacass.ucsd DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:06:30 -0700; Well, thanks everyone! I'm just barely smart enough to do so but that is exactly why I asked first! Yes, I really do have tapes that old. Is that unusual? I backup up a LOT of linux and unix machines; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00098.html (16,081 bytes)
6. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Paul Yeatman <pyeatman AT mamacass.ucsd DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:27:48 -0700; Ah, I see what is going on. For all the log files I have, I was wondering how even so many 1-4K files were adding up to 84G. So, I ran an ls piped to sort and it turns out that the size of this direc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00099.html (12,081 bytes)
7. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:53:32 -0400; Sure, that won't be a problem. If the run produced no useful dumps, you could also just delete the whole file. Dustin -- Storage Software Engineer http://www.zmanda.com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00100.html (11,957 bytes)
8. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:01:10 -0400; Not really, but it does end up being a lot of logfiles, as you indicate :) Someday (>>wistful sigh<<) we'll have a DB-backed catalog, so folks like you with lots of tapes won't have to worry about ma; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00101.html (11,780 bytes)
9. Re: lots of log files (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:19:34 -0400; We could stand that now Dustin. The problem as I see it though is in compressing it while still maintaining it in a human readable format. This, for bare metal recovery operations that really do need; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-06/msg00102.html (12,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]