Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amflush\s+and\s+splitted\s+disk\s+entry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amflush\s+and\s+splitted\s+disk\s+entry\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: julien brule <julien.brule AT obspm DOT fr>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:11:36 +0200; It looks like you have all of the appropriate holding files there, so perhaps they are corrupted somehow? I would suggest two things: - use 'amadmin <conf> holding list -l' to see what Amanda really; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00097.html (12,856 bytes)
2. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:43:44 -0400; I think that this has nothing to do with chunked holding disk files (which are completely different from split files on tape). Rather, you have datestamps (8 digits) in your headers, but timestamps (; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00098.html (11,684 bytes)
3. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:17:28 -0400; Rather, you have datestamps (8 digits) in your headers, but timestamps (14 digits) in your holding-disk directory names. It's normal on old release or if usetimestamps is set to "no" What version of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00099.html (12,219 bytes)
4. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: julien brule <julien.brule AT obspm DOT fr>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:44:39 +0200; Rather, you have datestamps (8 digits) in your headers, but timestamps (14 digits) in your holding-disk directory names. It's normal on old release or if usetimestamps is set to "no" What version of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00100.html (12,741 bytes)
5. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: julien brule <julien.brule AT obspm DOT fr>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:26:07 +0200; julien brule wrote: Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: I think that this has nothing to do with chunked holding disk files (which are completely different from split files on tape); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00117.html (13,340 bytes)
6. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: julien brule <julien.brule AT obspm DOT fr>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:53:24 +0200; hi all, Does someone have an idea for flushing my chunk to the tape when you get "Could not find any valid dump image, check directory" message ? Which file could help me to understand the problem ?; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00162.html (14,041 bytes)
7. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:05:02 -0700; Try changing the value of 'usetimestamps' -- there was a bug in which Amanda confused the names of directories (which are always 14 digits) with the datestamps (which, in your case, are 8 digits). Th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00166.html (14,815 bytes)
8. Re: amflush and splitted disk entry (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:14:13 -0500; Sorry -- this floated away into my INBOX. It looks like you have all of the appropriate holding files there, so perhaps they are corrupted somehow? I would suggest two things: - use 'amadmin <conf> h; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-03/msg00010.html (10,887 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]